Tissue Engineering And Nanotheranostics

(Steven Felgate) #1
b2815 Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics “9.61x6.69”

40 Tissue Engineering and Nanotheranostics


the physiological conditions encountered by the mesh, biaxial testing


and in vivo models would provide superior insights into mesh perfor-


mance. It would be interesting to study the effect on fetal patches


during the breathing cycle of the mother. If the breathing cycle of the


mother exerts any kind of pressure before the incision in the placenta


has completely healed, dynamic tests might be of importance.


Deeken and Abdo assessed the physico-mechanical behavior of


surgical meshes used in hernia repair.^20 Nine FDA-approved meshes


were assessed, including four uncoated, one PTFE, one polyester and


three with partially absorbable filaments. Each specimen was made


using a 2.5 cm × 5.1 cm template, thickness was measured using laser


micrometry and density was calculated by dividing specimen mass by


specimen area. Tear resistance testing was established in compliance


with ASTM specification #D2261-07a. A 2.5 cm slit was cut from the


edge to the center of the mesh to create 2 tabs and each tab was


clamped in the upper and lower grips of an Instron machine (Fig. 8(a)).


Out of the 12 mesh specimens considered, six were oriented perpen-


dicular and other six were parallel to longest dimension of the mesh


interstices. Tear strength was computed as the maximum load sus-


tained by the mesh, when the specimen was stretched in tension at


300 mm/min.^20 For ball burst testing, five specimens measuring 9 cm ×


9 cm were prepared and mesh orientation was not taken into account


owing to the biaxial nature of the test.^20 A test fixture was constructed


Fig. 8. Biomechanical test fixtures for (a) tear resistance and (b) burst testing.^20

(a) (b)
Free download pdf