Researching Higher Education in Asia History, Development and Future

(Romina) #1

32


nationally by Asian-affiliated higher-education researchers. To prevent bias, it is
necessary for higher-education researchers in Asia to write their own accounts of the
development of regional higher-education systems and to publish these accounts in
the international higher-education literature. They must continue to collaborate with
colleagues from other parts of the world when writing about Asia, but also to increase
their collaboration with other Asian researchers to gain insights into the different
dynamics of development of higher education across Asia. Initiatives fostering com-
munication and networking have already been established to form a coherent and
participatory higher-education research community in Asia, which will play a crucial
role in achieving an in-depth and nuanced understanding of the region and in making
knowledge of Asian higher education available to the world.


References

Alatas, S.  H. (2000). Intellectual imperialism: Definition, traits, and problems. Southeast Asian
Journal of Social Science, 28(1), 23–45.
Altbach, P. G., Bozeman, L. A., Janashia, N., & Rumbley, L. E. (Eds.). (2006). Higher education:
A worldwide inventory of centers and programs. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ashwin, P., Deem, R., & McAlpine, L. (2015). Newer researchers in higher education: Policy
actors or policy subjects. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1029902.
Atkinson, R. (2013). Journals with borders, journals without borders: Underrepresentation of Asian
countries in educational research journals. Higher Education Research and Development,
32 (3), 507–510.
Boyd, P., & Smith, C. (2016). The contemporary academic: Orientation towards research work and
researcher identity of higher education lecturers in the health professions. Studies in Higher
Education, 41(4), 678–695.
Brennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research.
Higher Education, 56(3), 259–264.
Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2011). Run of the Red Queen: Government, innovation, globaliza-
tion, and economic growth in China. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Signori, A. (2016). Performance-based funding and university research
productivity: The moderating effect of university legitimacy. Journal of Technology Transfer,
41 (1), 85–104.
Chan, S.-J., & Chan, Y. (2015). Higher education research community in Taiwan: An emerging
field. Higher Education Policy, 28(4), 459–475.
Chen, K.-H. (2010). Asia as a method: Towards deimperialization. Durham: Duke University
Press.
Chen, S. (2015). Boundary objects and boundary brokering to make the research-policy-practice
nexus possible: The case of the Chinese higher education field. Higher Education Policy, 28(4),
441–457.
Chen, S.-Y., & Hu, L. F. (2012). Higher education research as a field in China: Its formation and
current landscape. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(5), 655–666.
Choi, P. K. (2010). ‘weep for Chinese university’: A case study of English hegemony and academic
capitalism in higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 233–252.
David, M. E. (2011). Overview of researching global higher education: Challenge, change or cri-
sis? Contemporary Social Science, 6(2), 147–165.


H. Horta
Free download pdf