The Price of Prestige
lily
(lily)
#1
conclusions 163
prestige? And if so, how much are we willing to invest? What are the
opportunity costs of such investments? A discussion of the political and
normative price of prestige is especially important for understanding con-
temporary international trends. Times of ambiguity and change create a
particularly conducive setting for the emergence of Veblen effects. Ours is
a system in which there are high levels of uncertainty regarding both the
distribution of power and the symbols of power. Indeed, this is a system
in which there is very little consensus on how to rank or even to con-
ceptualize the order of the international social hierarchy. It is therefore
not surprising to observe a new surge in apparent cases of conspicuous
consumption, such as the reawakening of the race to space, the emergence
of nascent naval arms races (mainly in the Pacific and Indian Oceans), or
a new wave of ambitious construction projects. Consequently, the current
system makes the study of Veblen effects a very timely and important
topic.
A Veblenian world is populated by prestige maximizers. They are
involved in an endless and expensive cycle of invidious comparison and
pecuniary emulation and are obsessed with the way in which they are per-
ceived by their peers. The conspicuous consumer is still a rational actor,
driven to prefer ostentatious venues of expenditure by the social institu-
tions of her prestige space. This depiction stands in contrast to mainstream
international relations theory, which views its actors as power maximizers,
security maximizers, or welfare maximizers (Mearsheimer 2001 , 138 ; Brooks
1997 ).
By portraying actors as prestige maximizers, the conspicuous consump-
tion theory reemphasizes the competitive nature of the international arena.
In this sense, the world depicted here is not dissimilar to the one portrayed
by traditional realists, who tend to view their actors as motivated by the
quest for power or security. However, unlike most realist accounts, con-
spicuous consumption understands prestige, and therefore power, to be in-
herently social. In fact, the definition of prestige used in this study suggests
that the term prestige is meaningless in the absence of at least a rudimentary
level of societiness. As a social concept, the contextual meaning of pres-
tige relies on the specific intersubjective norms and values of every prestige
space. Once the norms change, the way in which conspicuous consumption
manifests itself changes as well. The suggestion that states can establish sta-
tus through a contest of beneficence that can over time replace traditional
force- based venues of competition, for example, is one that cannot be eas-
ily accounted for by a theoretical framework that views its actors as power