1550251515-Classical_Complex_Analysis__Gonzalez_

(jair2018) #1
Singularities/Residues/ Applications 697

1


(^00) x (^2) dx


10. -oo (x2 + 2x + 2)2 = 71'

11 loo dx = 71'



  • _ 00 (x^2 - 4x + 8)^2 16


12.100 dx = 371'

_ 00 (x^2 + 4)(x^2 + 4x + 5) 26

1


(^00) cosax 71' -ab
13.
0
x 2 + b 2 dx = 2 b e (a > 0, b > 0)
(^14) • 1= xsinxdx 71' ( )
0 (x2+1)(x2+4) = 6e2 e-l
15.1
00


x:in~~ dx= b~e-abf-./2sin(ab/./2) (a>O,b>O)

-oo x +


16 Joo x cos x dx 71' •

·(a) 2


2 5

= -
2 2

(cosl - 2sml)

_ 00 x - x + e


1


(^00) xsinxdx 71' •
(b) 2
2 5
= -
2 2


(2cosl +sml)


_ 00 x - x + e


Type IV. (PV) J~;: f(z) dx, where f(x) satisfies the following conditions:

1. f ( x) has an extension f ( z) that is meromorphic in C (or at least on

either Imz ~ 0 or Imz ::::; 0).

2. , f ( z) has simple poles on the real axis.


  1. J(z) = 0(1/zOI), a: > 1, as z -t oo.
    As before, condition (3) implies that f(z) has a finite number of poles in
    C, in particular, on the real axis.
    First we examine the case of just a simple pole on the real line. Consider
    the integral


J f(z)dz


c+

where c+ = [-R,p-r] +7-+ [p+r, R] +r+, with -R < p-r, p+r < R,


7-: z - p = Reio, 71' ~ 8 ~ 0, r+: z = rei^6 , 0 :::; 8 :$ 71', as shown in

Fig. 9.16. Choosing R large enough and r sufficiently small so that all
poles bk (k = 1, ... , m) off in Imz > 0 be enclosed by c+, we have


J f(z)dz= 1::r J(x)dx+ J f(z)dz+ i:rf(x)dx+ J f(z)dz


c+ 'Y- r+
m
= 27l'i""' Res f(z)
L...J z=bk
k=l

(9.11-19)
Free download pdf