Barbara_E._Mundy]_The_Death_of_Aztec_Tenochtitlan

(vip2019) #1

218 • noTes To Pages 86–101


Mayor market was as important in the sixteenth
century as in the seventeenth, but there is little
direct evidence to support this point, except for
the description of cabildo historian Francisco
Cervantes de Salazar, Life in the Imperial and
Loyal City of Mexico in New Spain, trans. Minnie
Lee Barrett Shepard, 41–42 (quoted at the
beginning of chapter 10). Jorge Olvera Ramos,
Los mercados de la Plaza Mayor en la Ciudad de
México. For instance, Henry Hawks does not
mention a market in the Plaza Mayor in his
1572 report on New Spain’s commerce. Henry
Hawks, “A Relation of the Commodities of
Nova Hispana,” 545–553. On the role of floods
in relocating the markets, see Archivo General
de la Nación, Mexico, Indios 12, 1st pte., exp. 236,
fol. 148, and 2nd pte., exp. 68, fol. 199.



  1. The evidence for their daily operation is
    indirect: a 1595 order that Indians that sell in the
    tianguises of the plazas of Santiago, San Juan,
    and San Hipólito refrain from doing so after
    mass on Sundays and on feast days would have
    been unnecessary if they did not run on these
    days (Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico,
    Indios 6, 2nd pte., exp. 1063, fol. 289); Hawks, “A
    Relation of the Commodities of Nova Hispana.”

  2. Vasco de Puga, Provisiones, cedulas,
    instrucciones de su Magestad . . . , 2:148, 188–189,
    248–249. More on viceregal attempts at
    provisioning the city is covered in Gibson, The
    Aztecs under Spanish Rule, 355; Pedro de Gante
    is mentioned in Olvera Ramos, Los mercados de
    la Plaza Mayor, 60.

  3. In Francisco del Paso y Troncoso and
    Silvio Arturo Zavala, eds., Epistolario de Nueva
    España, 1505–1818, 15:162–165 (doc. 876).

  4. Dibble, Códice Aubin, 63.

  5. Cervantes de Salazar, Life in the Imperial
    and Loyal City of Mexico, 57; Kubler, Mexican
    Architecture of the Sixteenth Century, 1:205.

  6. Martha Fernández, “Convento de Nuestra
    Señora de Regina Coeli,” in Armando Ruiz, ed.,
    Arquitectura religiosa de la ciudad de México, 170.

  7. Olvera Ramos, Los mercados de la Plaza
    Mayor, 68.

  8. In personal communication with me
    in 2012, Jonathan Truitt underscored the
    preeminence of women in the marketplace;
    also confirming their preeminence are orders
    specifically directed to indigenous female sellers
    (named as “indias”) in Archivo General de la
    Nación, Mexico, Indios 4, exp. 4; Indios 6, exp.
    79; Indios 6, exp. 234.

  9. Jacqueline de Durand-Forest, “Cambios
    económicos y moneda entre los aztecas”; Janet
    Long-Solís, “El abastecimiento de chile en el
    mercado de la ciudad de México-Tenochtitlan
    en el siglo XVI”; Lockhart, The Nahuas after the
    Conquest, 185–198. Given the fidelity of copies to
    their originals in other works of the collection


of Lorenzo Boturini Benaduci (1702–1755), I
trust that the copy of the map of the tianguis is
an equally faithful copy of the now-lost original.
This copy seems to have been made under the
direction of the collector Aubin, because the
word “effacé,” meant to mark an effaced area on
the original, also appears, written in the same
hand, on a copy he commissioned of the Codex
en Cruz (see Charles E. Dibble, ed., Codex en
Cruz, atlas, 68–69). This leads me to suppose
that Aubin, while in Mexico in the 1830s, was
looking at the original of the tianguis map
when he wrote his comment (“effacé”) on the
copy. While Aubin took the copy to France, the
original may have remained in Mexico.


  1. Elinor G. K. Melville, A Plague of Sheep:
    Environmental Consequences of the Conquest of
    Mexico.

  2. In the Codex Santa Anita Zacatlalmanco,
    indigenous leaders of the city of the later
    sixteenth century wear hats. Codex Santa
    Anita Zacatlalmanco, 71.1878.1.2970: Manuscrit
    Mexico, Musée du quai Branly.

  3. Woodrow Wilson Borah, Silk Raising in
    Colonial Mexico.

  4. Gibson, too, notes the “conservatism
    of Indian material culture” in the markets in
    the valley in The Aztecs under Spanish Rule,
    353, commenting further on “the absence of
    European tools, hardware, glass, and clothing, all
    which lay beyond the ordinary Indian’s needs or
    economic opportunities.”

  5. Joaquín Aguirre and Juan Manuel
    Montalbán, Recopilacion compendiada de las leyes
    de Indias, aumentada con algunas notas que no
    se hallan en la edicion de 1841 . . . , 407. Archivo
    General de la Nación, Mexico, Tierras 35, exp. 2,
    fol. 133r.

  6. Mier y Terán Rocha, La primera traza,



  7. “... dejando a los indios sus propriedades.”
    Aguirre and Montalbán, Recopilacion compen-
    diada de las leyes de Indias, 4 0 7.

  8. Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, September 19,

  9. Barbara E. Mundy, “ Pictography, Writing,
    and Mapping in the Valley of Mexico and the
    Beinecke Map,” in Mary Miller and Barbara E.
    Mundy, eds., Painting a Map of Sixteenth-Century
    Mexico City: Land, Writing and Native Rule,
    42–48.

  10. Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, January 5, 1526.

  11. See references in Archivo General de
    la Nación, Mexico, Mercedes 5, which outline
    the powers of the Spanish alguacil and other
    directives. Traditionally, indigenous governors
    and their tianguizhuaque (market overseers)
    controlled markets. Lockhart, The Nahuas after
    the Conquest, 185–198.

  12. Land grants are covered in Mier y Terán
    Rocha, La primera traza.
    66. Henri Delacroix, La religion et la foi,
    quoted in Halbwachs, On Collective Memory,
    88n4.
    67. Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, July 31, 1528.
    68. On the cost of the pendón, see Bejarano,
    Actas de cabildo, March 9, 1528; trumpets are
    mentioned in Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, August
    27, 1529; the pattern of the celebration is set out
    in Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, August 11, 1529,
    and the description varies slightly in its timing
    from that described by Diego Valadés, Retórica
    Cristiana, trans. Tarsicio Herrera Zapién,
    467–469, who includes a long description,
    probably as he witnessed it. It is also described
    in Cervantes de Salazar, Life in the Imperial and
    Loyal City of Mexico, 69.
    69. After 1535, the regidor who led the
    procession was accompanied by the viceroy and
    the head of the audiencia, thereby putting on
    display the structure of city government, as it
    would develop.
    70. On other rituals, see Linda Curcio-Nagy,
    The Great Festivals of Colonial Mexico City:
    Performing Power and Identity.
    71. Valadés, Retórica Cristiana, 467–469.
    72. Arthur J. O. Anderson, trans., Bernardino
    de Sahagún’s “Psalmodia Christiana” (Christian
    Psalmody), 244–245.
    73. Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, 104.
    74. A smaller set of names is used for new
    Spanish constructions; thus, we find the
    Atarazanas, or the “docks,” at the eastern limit
    of the city; this name appears even in Nahuatl
    documents.
    75. In René Acuña, ed., “Descripción de la
    ciudad y provincia de Tlaxcala,” in Relaciones
    geográficas del siglo XVI, 4:253.
    76. Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, January 1, 1573;
    January 1, 1575; August 1, 1578; January 29, 1582.
    77. Chimalpahin, Annals of His Time, 71, 81,
    169, 241, 299.
    78. Chimalpahin, Codex Chimalpahin, 1:159.


chaPTeR 5


  1. Tezozomoc, Crónica mexicayotl, 164.

  2. Evidence for this is found in Archivo
    General de las Indias, Seville, Justicia 232, charge
    2: documentation of the visita (visit of oversight)
    of Vasco de Quiroga, in which one of the
    witnesses is “don Diego, indio principal of the
    barrio of San Juan, who states that he is more
    than 50 years old.” Quoted in Ruiz Medrano,
    Reshaping New Spain, 24.

  3. Gibson, The Aztecs under Spanish Rule,
    271–273.

  4. On contests between city Indians and
    the cabildo over lands reserved for the common
    good, called ejidos in Spanish, just in the decade
    of 1534–1544, see Bejarano, Actas de cabildo,

Free download pdf