Barbara_E._Mundy]_The_Death_of_Aztec_Tenochtitlan

(vip2019) #1

222 • noTes To Pages 139–165


containing a serpent, but in Genaro García 30
is shown with a winged serpent.



  1. While Nahuatl had long and short vowels,
    the pictographic writing system ignored them.
    Thus “pāmitl” (banner), with its long a, could
    be used as a phoneme for “pan” (upon), with a
    short a.

  2. Tezozomoc, Crónica mexicayotl, 61.

  3. The residencia of Guzmán is mentioned in
    Chimalpahin, Codex Chimalpahin, 2:177, and in
    Tezozomoc, Crónica mexicayotl, 175.

  4. Rousseau, quoted in Jacques Derrida,
    Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty
    Spivak, 27; Saussure discussed in “Linguistics
    and Grammatology,” in Of Grammatology, 27–73;
    Derrida, Of Grammatology, 41, 52.

  5. Derrida develops a related set of ideas
    in “The End of the Book and the Beginning of
    Writing,” in Of Grammatology, 6–26.

  6. Sahagún, Florentine Codex, bk. 9, esp. chs.
    14–19, pp. 63–85.

  7. This translation found in Chimalpahin,
    Codex Chimalpahin, 1:173. Many indigenous
    leaders of central Mexico joined Antonio
    de Mendoza in this campaign against the
    Chichimecs. See Joaquín García Icazbalceta,
    ed., “Relacion de la jornada de don Francisco de
    Sandoval Acazitli,” in Colección de documentos
    para la historia de México, 2:307–332.

  8. Epidemics summarized in Peter Gerhard,
    Geografía histórica de la Nueva España 1519–1821,
    trans. Stella Mastrangelo, 23.

  9. Alonso de Zorita, Life and Labor in
    Ancient Mexico: The Brief and Summary Relation
    of the Lords of New Spain, ed. and trans. Benja-
    min Keen, 212.

  10. Acuña-Soto et al., “Megadrought and
    Megadeath in 16th Century Mexico.”

  11. Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, June 21, 1546.

  12. Ruiz Medrano, Reshaping New Spain.

  13. See the discussion in Castañeda de la Paz,
    “Sibling Maps, Spatial Rivalries.”

  14. According to María Castañeda de la Paz,
    from 1551 indigenous lords were obliged to pay
    the laborers who worked their lands (personal
    communication, 2009). The shift in support is
    detailed by Gibson, The Aztecs under Spanish
    Rule, 185–188.

  15. See, for instance, Bejarano, Actas de
    cabildo, November 11, 1533. This case is to be
    found in Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico,
    Tierras 35, exp. 2, and is an earlier lawsuit folded
    into a later one.

  16. The career of Tejada is covered in Ruiz
    Medrano, Reshaping New Spain. A juicio de
    residencia is to be found in Archivo General de
    Indias, Seville, Justicia 260.

  17. Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico,
    Tierras 35, exp. 2, fol. 62.

  18. Bejarano, Actas de cabildo, July 19, 1549.
    46. Woodrow Wilson Borah, Justice by
    Insurance: The General Indian Court of Colonial
    Mexico and the Legal Aides of the Half-Real.
    47. The text reads: “El dicho don Diego
    tiránicamente con poco temor de Dios nuestro
    señor nos las quito por fuerza, algunos echando
    en la cárcel, a otros desterrados y otros dándoles
    tormentos y otras muchas molestias.” Codex
    Cozcatzin, fol. 9v. The Codex Cozcatzin has
    been published by Ana Rita Valero de García
    Lascuráin in Los códices de Ixhuatepec: Un
    testimonio pictográfico de dos siglos de conflicto
    agrario. Some historians have mistakenly said
    the complaint was filed against the governor
    of Tlatelolco, but if this were the case, the
    complainants would have identified themselves
    as from Tlatelolco, not Mexico. The correct
    attribution is to be found in López Mora,
    “El cacicazgo de Diego de Mendoza Austria y
    Moctezuma,” 232. The group of documents is
    also discussed by Castañeda de la Paz, “Filología
    de un ‘Corpus’ pintado.”
    48. Castañeda de la Paz, “Historia de una
    casa real,” 14, names Dionosio as being from San
    Pablo. Chimalpahin, Annals of His Time, 301,
    says Tehuetzquititzin is from San Pablo.
    49. Bernardino de Sahagún, Primeros
    memoriales, trans. Thelma Sullivan, facsimile,
    55v; Eduard Seler, “Ancient Mexican Attire and
    Insignia of Social and Military Rank,” 3:3–61,
    esp. 5–16.
    50. Durán, History, 124.
    51. Zorita, Life and Labor in Ancient Mexico,
    188–189.
    52. Connell, After Moctezuma, 22–54.
    53. Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 48, 111. The
    source is Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico,
    Civil 644.
    54. For instance, the daughter of don Andrés
    de Tapia Motelchiuhtzin, the gobernador of
    Mexico from 1526 to 1530, married the native
    gobernador of Izcuincuitlapilco, a town to the
    south of Actopan, Hidalgo. Archivo General de
    la Nación, Mexico, Tierras 46, exp. 4.
    55. Reproduced in Pérez-Rocha and Tena,
    La nobleza indígena, 199–200.
    56. The Codex Aubin notes that Guzmán
    “habrían de investigar a don Diego” (would have
    to investigate don Diego [Tehuetzquititzin]),
    Dibble, Códice Aubin.
    57. Guzmán appears in the ruler list of the
    Plano Parcial de la Ciudad de México; the
    Codex Aubin notes his accession, as does the
    Tira de Tepechpan. Lori Boornazian Diel, Tira
    de Tepechpan: Negotiating Place under Aztec and
    Spanish Rule.
    58. Pilar Arregui Zamorano, La Audiencia
    de México según los visitadores, siglos xvi y xvii;
    Gerónimo Valderrama, “Cartas del licenciado
    Jerónimo Valderrama y otros documentos


sobre su visita al gobierno de Nueva España,
1563–1565.”


  1. The Codex Osuna, created under the
    auspices of the native cabildo and governors,
    shows them at their best; Cortés Alonso,
    Pintura del gobernador, alcaldes y regidores de
    México: Códice Osuna. Complaints by the native
    community that Guzmán’s reforms were never
    carried out are alluded to in Archivo General
    de la Nación, Mexico, Civil 644, reproduced in
    Chávez Orozco, Códice Osuna, 13, 47, 49, 56.

  2. Escalante Gonzalbo, Los Códices
    mesoamericanos, 286–292.

  3. Cortés Alonso, Pintura del gobernador,
    alcaldes y regidores de México: Códice Osuna,
    fol. 9v.

  4. Pérez-Rocha and Tena, La nobleza
    indígena, 192.

  5. These monies would directly benefit
    the church, rather than, as was the existing
    case, having Indians pay tribute to the Crown,
    from which funds to support the Crown were
    extracted. The native position is clear: tithing
    would have been an addition to their tax burden.
    Also, the mendicants, headed by the Augustin-
    ian theologian Alonso de Vera Cruz, argued
    vociferously to the king that the collection of
    tithes would destroy native faith in the church.
    Magnus Lundberg, Unification and Conflict:
    The Church Politics of Alonso de Montúfar, O.P.,
    Archbishop of Mexico, 1554–1572, 155. Guzmán
    certainly knew of these disputes—Vera Cruz
    preached publicly on the danger of tithes, and
    the native leaders themselves were asked for
    their opinions on the matter by the Crown in

  6. Their responses are in Archivo General de
    la Nación, Mexico, Justicia 160, cited in Lund-
    berg. The tithes seem not to have been imposed.
    Lundberg, Unification and Conflict, 158–159.

  7. Pérez-Rocha and Tena, La nobleza
    indígena, 191–200.

  8. On sweeping, see Louise M. Burkhart,
    The Slippery Earth: Nahua-Christian Moral
    Dialogue in Sixteenth-Century Mexico, 117–125.

  9. Mendieta, Historia eclesiástica indiana,
    bk. 4, ch. 18, 429.

  10. George Kubler points out the sacred
    and ritual nature of building activities, giving
    the construction of the tecpan at Santiago
    Tlatelolco as an example: “Using the symbols
    and expressions of Christianity, the Indians
    attempted to identify their work with religious
    behavior.” Kubler, Mexican Architecture of the
    Sixteenth Century, 1:157. The construction of
    the Mexico City tecpan was punctuated by
    similar rituals. See Reyes García, Anales de Juan
    Bautista, 155.

  11. Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico,
    Tierras 37, exp. 2. I thank Edward Calnek for
    bringing this document to my attention.

Free download pdf