Barron\'s - 05.08.2019

(Michael S) #1

28 BARRON’S August 5, 2019


Jason Smerdon finds he can’t be 100% pure in his investments. That means he


balances his ideals with saving for retirement. BySophiaCai


HowaClimateScientist


GrapplesWithInvesting


WHEN JASON SMERDON OPENED UP A RETIREMENT


account as a postdoctoral fellow a decade and a


halfago,hegravitatedtowardsociallyresponsible


stockfunds,despitethepossibilityofweakerre-


turns.Hefiguredhisidealsweremoreimportant


than investment performance.


Fast-forward 15 years, and his investment phi-


losophy is no longer as black and white. Since the


economic downturn a decade ago, he has moved a


majorityofhisretirementportfoliointoaggressive


growth funds and only factors environmental con-


cernsintotheequationwheninvestinginindividual


stocks.


Smerdon, 43, who lives with his wife and two


children in New York, is juggling his conscience


alongwithhisfamily’sfinancialhealth.“It’sthekind


of thing where you start building wealth and you


say, ‘What’s being stupid and what is not?’ All of


thatconsciousnesscamein2008and’09whenIreal-


izedIdon’twanttobecaughtinaconservativetrap


where I’m not beating inflation.”


Smerdon isn’t an ordinary investor worried


aboutthefutureoftheplanet.He’saclimatesci-


entistatColumbiaUniversity’sLamont-Doherty


Earth Observatory and co-director of the Earth


Institute’sundergraduateprograminsustainable


development.


He does his part to save the planet, powering


his home with renewable energy and saving the


biodegradable salad bowls he uses at lunch to


compostathome.Buthealsorealizesthatthings


aren’talwayssosimple.Giventheconstraintson


histimeandresourcesandlimitedinvestmentop-


tions, it’s hard to be 100% pure.


ForSmerdon,thatmeansrelinquishingsomeof


thoseidealswheninvestinginbonds,realestate,


andanyvarietyoffundswhileconstructinganon-


linebrokerageportfoliotoincludespecificcompa-


nies whose core businesses are more in keeping


with his work and his values.


“There is this tension between the kinds of


things that make sense as an investor and how


youcanbestinvestforyourvaluesandyourcon-


science,”saysSmerdon,whosayshehasseenan-


nualizedreturnsinthemidteenssincehefirstbe-


ganinvestingin2013.“Iliketothinkthosethings


balance out in some kind of compromise.”


Some of his colleagues are more rigid in their


investment philosophy. Satyajit Bose, associate


director of Columbia’s Program in Sustainable


Finance, says he avoids stocks such as defense


companies. He also shuns stocks on the Norwe-


gian Pension Fund’s list of investments that are


excluded from the country’s $1.07 trillion govern-


ment Pension Fund Global due to ethical reasons.


StevenCohen,formerexecutivedirectorofthe


EarthInstitute,doesn’tdoverymuchinvestingof


hisown,butbelievesthatcompletedivestmentfrom


fossil fuels isn’t the best approach. “[Climate


change]isnotgoingtobesolvedwithouttheprivate


sector,soIwouldtakethemon,”hesays.“Iwould


engage with them. I’m not big on divestment.”


Smerdon,Bose,andCohenareamongseveral


hundredscientists,economists,andotherbusiness


and policy experts at the Earth Institute and its


16 academic and research centers. Among their


findingssofar:“Humanactivityandthedesirefor


economicimprovementarestrainingtheplanet’s


resources,threateningthehealthofourenviron-


ment and ability to thrive.”


Smerdon, who reads stock assessments while


puttinghiskidstosleep,nowbelievesthatputting


hismoneyintomutualfundsmakesalotofsense,


but that has forced him to adjust to having less


controloverthespecificcompaniesheinvestsin.


“Withinmyretirementaccount, I’vebasically


givenuponanykindofidealizedinvestmentprin-


ciples”becausewithinthetraditionalfundoptions,


he’sunabletoweedoutstockshewouldotherwise


prefer not to put money in. Oil companies are


virtually impossible to avoid, he says.


Even the exchange-traded funds that come the


closest to aligning with his background in climate


change—the “low carbon” ETFs—frequently in-


clude oil and defense stocks that run against his


conscience.


In2013,heopenedanE*Tradeaccount,which


gavehimleewaytoselectindividualstocks.Since


then,gainsinindividualstockpurchaseshavedi-


minishedhisETFshare.Exchange-tradedfunds


likethe iSharesMSCIKLD400Social (DSI)and


VanguardMid-Cap (VO)stillmakeup15%ofhis


funds portfolio, but that is a far smaller share


than in the past.


Smerdon’s work as a climate scientist inevita-


bly seeps into the construction of his stock port-


folio. His climatological research has shown that


the Southwest and Plains states may face global-


warming megadroughts—droughts that last for


several decades—as early as 2050. He owns


shares of Pennsylvania-based water utility Aqua


America (WTR), but says he’s skeptical of invest-


ments “that depend on the minimal and fickle


water resources in the West,” such as the agricul-


ture sector.


Smerdon also holds positions in companies


thathaveintegratedrenewableenergyintotheir


core businesses— NextEra Energy (NEE),


Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP), and


First Solar (FSLR).


Climate-relatedopportunitiesandrisksaren’t


the only things that Smerdon considers when


pickingstocks.Nostalgiadriveshisinvestmentin


AbbottLaboratories (ABT),thesubjectofinvest-


menttalkheheardaboutatthedinnertablewhen


he was growing up. Smerdon’s parents own the


familystockthathasbeenpasseddownfrompre-


vious generations, but Smerdon bought his own


shares.


“With the baby boomers aging, it’s probably


stupid not to be in health care in some form or


Photograph by Lissy Elle Laricchia another,” he says.


“There is this


tension between


the kinds of


things that make


sense as an


investor and


how you can


best invest your


values and your


conscience.”


Jason Smerdon


Climate scientist

Free download pdf