CORRECTIONS
We had some errors in our
July/August issue:
A production file error resulted in
several mistakes in the periodic
table of elements: an incorrect
chemical symbol, and various
names and atomic weights that
had been flip-flopped. A corrected
and printable version is available at
DiscoverMagazine.com/periodic
along with an updated version of
the story.
A small illustration of the types
of tectonic plates was incorrect.
Denser oceanic plates sink below
continental plates.
On a misty autumn
morning in Australia’s
Royal National Park,
just south of Sydney,
a peloton of nearly
two dozen cyclists
tackles a 3,740-foot
ascent. When they
reach the highest
point of the day’s
45-mile ride —
the first leg of a
weeklong journey
— they’re rewarded
with cookies and
candy from support
staff, followed by
a downhill glide
along a sandstone
escarpment. Far
below them, waves
of the Pacific barrel
toward shore and
explode in clouds
of foam.
The group is not
training for an athletic
event. Instead, the
21 cyclists and their
support crew have
united to promote
an unconventional
pain management
approach. The team
wants to start a
revolution. The road
T ahead is a long one.
A
M
E
T
H
E
Just one incident
can make the brain
overreact to future
experiences. Researchers
believe the solution is
to reframe and retrain.
BY CATHRYN JAKOBSON RAMIN
40 41
P
A
I
N
John
Richburg
I already have. Twice.
I now know I am genetically
predisposed to macular degeneration.
I can spend the rest of my life keeping
that closely monitored and take steps to
prevent it before any symptoms show up.
My grandmother on my father’s side
and my mother both died too early from
Alzheimer’s. Any testing I can do, and
research I can help with, is much
preferable to me than to sit back
and do nothing but wait to lose
my mind.
Brett
Palmer
Ancestry, yes; health,
no. There are certain
things I don’t wanna
know. For example, if I’m
gonna get Alzheimer’s,
I’d rather be
surprised.
PRINT FEEDBACK
Decoding CRISPR
(“The State of Science: Genetics,” January/
February 2019)
I devoured Jessica McDonald’s story on
genetics with such interest that I kept
the pages open on my bedside table so
that I could read it again. And, perhaps
on the fourth or fifth read, I became
somewhat concerned that people might be
frustrated by the acronym CRISPR, which
is referred to over and over again. Those
of us with journalism, scientific and similar
backgrounds might know the term, but a
first-time reader might not. I don’t think a
brief definition of the acronym would have
taken up that much space.
Richard V.H. Buell
Cochrane, Ontario, Canada
Editor’s note: CRISPR stands for
clustered regularly interspaced short
palindromic repeats.
Embracing the Itch
(“Tame the Pain,” March 2019)
This article fit nicely into something I’ve
been exploring lately. Whenever I had an
itch or discomfort, I would immediately
scratch or rub it. I sometimes worried,
“What would I do if I couldn’t scratch it?”
That sort of situation would drive me crazy.
But then one day I thought, “This is just an
electrical signal going from a part of my
body to my brain, so it really only exists in
my brain.” It seems to me that pain is similar,
except the pain is telling you things like,
“Take your hand off the hot stove, stupid.”
Even though pain evolved to help us avoid
things that harm our bodies, the pain itself
is an epiphenomenon — it really only exists
in our brains.
Arthur Jackson
San Jose, Calif.
Cost of Care
(“The Big Sleep,” December 2018)
The writer, Eliezer J. Sternberg, describes
the case of a woman who goes from an
ambulance to the emergency room to the
ICU. He outlines various treatments, drugs
administered, etc., before settling on a
diagnosis. All told, the patient spent nine
months in the hospital and was still there at
the end of the article. My question concerns
something not mentioned in the article:
Who paid for all of this medical care? Health
insurance? Medicare or Medicaid? The
patient herself? The Good Fairy, perhaps?
I have read all the Vital Signs articles that
have been published, and the matter of
cost, and who pays it, is almost never
mentioned. I believe this very important
aspect of medical care should be addressed
in the future.
Paul Wolff
Flushing, N.Y.
WEB FEEDBACK
To Test or Not to Test?
DNA testing kits, like those from 23andMe,
AncestryDNA and MyHeritage, are all the
rage. In a time when personal information is
already hard to protect, some people worry
about shipping off their genetic information.
Still, on top of breaking down your ancestry,
many of the tests claim to be able to tell
you if you have genetic markers linked to
a range of medical issues — an appealing
feature for many consumers. We asked our
Facebook followers: Would you take a DNA
test for ancestry or health reasons?
7 0%
YES
NO
30%
NONO
Address letters to: DISCOVER
21027 Crossroads Circle, P.O. Box 1612
Waukesha, WI 53187-
Email: [email protected]
M
O
P
I
C
/
S
H
U
T
T
E
R
S
T
O
C
K
Barb
Overton
No. I have concerns
about the ethics for use of
genetic material or information.
If there are huge profits to be
made, shouldn’t some of that go
to the person who supplied the
genetic material? What
about privacy issues for
the person whose cells
are used?
SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2019
.
DISCOVER 7
INBOX
Feedback is edited
for space and clarity.