they
havehaddireconsequences,especially
indealings
withtheCastrucciosoftheworld.Stefanoknewthatthe
prince
hadrisentopowerthrough
treachery
andruthlessness.Thiswasa
man,after
all,
whohad
putacloseanddevotedfriendtodeath.WhenCastrucciowastoldthatithadbeena
terrible
wrong
tokill
suchanold
friend,
hereplied
that
hehadexecutednotanoldfriendbutanew
enemy.
AmanlikeCastruccioknowsonly
forceandself—interest.Whenthere-bellion
began,
toenditandplace
oneself
athis
mercywasthemostdan—
gerouspossible
move.EvenonceStefanodiPoggio
hadmadethatfatalmistake,however,
hestillhad
options:
He
could
haveoffered
moneytoCastruccio,
couldhavemadepromises
forthe
future,
couldhavepointed
outwhatthe
Poggios
couldstillcontributetoCastruccio’s
power-theirin-fluence
withthemostinfluentialfamiliesof
Rome,
forexample,
andthegreatmarriagethey
couldhavebrokered.InsteadStefanobroughtup
the
past,anddebtsthatcarriednoobliga-
tion.Not
only
isamannotobliged
tobegrateful,gratitude
isoftenaterri-bleburdenthathe
gladly
discards.AndinthiscaseCastruccioridhimselfofhis
obligations
tothePoggiosbyeliminating
thePoggios.
OBSERVANCEOFTHELAWIn4-33
B.C.,
just
beforethePeloponnesian
War,
theislandofCorcyra
(later
calledCorfu)
andtheGreekcity~state
of
Corinth
stoodonthebrinkofcon-flict.Both
parties
sentambassadorstoAthensto
trytowinovertheAtheni~anstotheirside.Thestakeswere
high,
sincewhoeverhadAthensonhissidewassuretowin.Andwhoeverwonthewarwould
certainlygive
thedefeatedsideno
mercy.
Corcyraspoke
first.Itsambassadorbeganbyadmitting
thattheislandhad
never
helped
Athens
before,
and
in
facthad
allieditselfwithAthens’senemies.Therewerenotiesof
friendship
orgratitude
betweenCorcyra
andAthens.
Yes,
theambassadorachnitted,
hehadcometoAthensnowoutoffearandconcernforCorcyra’ssafety.
Theonlything
hecouldofferwasan
alliance
ofmutualinterests.Corcyra
hadanavyonlysurpassed
insizeandstrength by
Athens’s
own;an
alliance
betweenthetwo
stateswouldcreateaformidable
force,
onethatcouldintimidatetherivalstateofSparta.
That,unfortunately,
wasallOorcyra
hadtooffer.Therepresentative
from Corinththen
gavea
brilliant,passionate
speech,
insharp
contrasttothedry,
colorlessapproach
oftheCorcyran.
Hetalkedof
everythingCorinth
had
done
for
Athens
inthepast.
He
askedhow
it
wouldlooktoAthens’sotherallies
if
the
cityputan
agreementwithaformer
enemyoveronewith a
presentfriend,
onethathadservedAthens’sinterestloyally:Perhaps
thoseallieswouldbreaktheir
agreementswithAthensifthey
sawthattheirloyalty
wasnotvalued.
Hereferred
toHellenic
law,andthe
needto
repayCorinthforallitsgood
deeds.Hefi-nally
wentontolistthe
manyservicesCorinthhadperformed
for
Athens,andthe
importanceofshowing
gratitude
toone’sfriends.Afterthespeech,
theAtheniansdebatedtheissueinanassembly.
OnMostmenaresothor-oughlyxubjeciivethatnothing
reallyintermlszhembu!1hmn.reIw.v.T/zr,-yalways
think
oftheirowncasnatmanas(war
anyremarkismade,andtheirwholeauenukmis
erzgrmxscdandabvorbedb
y
theInerestclmnre
rr:fr:r-mureto
anythingwhichuffct/sthem
personally,beitneversorcrnoze./\R1‘liURS(:xmm«‘r~:uALrr-.12.l7XX—l8tI(lLAWI3 97