ann
(Ann)
#1
So the twentieth-century socialist state declares human technology has
rendered herding obsolete,weather permitting. Of course, the weather
does not always permit, and in 2001 theTaipusiBanner of the Shili-yin
Gool League repasturizes. So the eighteenth-century Qing state seeks to
construct Mongol identity as solely and“naturally”dependent on live-
stock,weather permitting. Of course, the weather does not always permit,
and in 1879 Zhang Zhidong wants banner Mongols to forsake herding
for farming.
Neither instance is a purely mental exercise in which“men [sic] dis-
tance themselves from nature in order thus imaginatively to present it
to themselves...to determine how it is to be dominated.”^11 In both
instances subjects are formed through interaction with ecology and
culture, although this is not always recognized or fully anticipated. So it
is not“the human social condition”alone that“perpetually generates
frontiers, dismantles them and generates new ones.”^12 Although general
cultural relations unquestionably inform historical spaces, these relations
do not dictate their own terms of existence within an ecological vacuum.
In fact, disruptive change is a sign that dictation has displaced an adaptive
awareness along such marginal“cultural ecotones.”
In the ideal Qing cases, banner Mongols are impervious to Zunghars
anddzud; borderland Manchus can forage, farm, and bookkeep as
needed; chieftainship tribals diligently work paddies to banish ehe
sukdunforjunxian administration. In all cases, proper relations to
forest, steppe, and mountain are naturalized so that virtue is central
everywhere and marginalized nowhere. Relations must be maintained
with minimal supervision because of sheer ecological scale. Like its
forest and mountain counterparts, even now the steppe“is simply too
geographically dispersed and theunderlying problems too complex for
central officials to be aware of all the local nuances.”^13 Environmen-
tality becomes the prerequisite adaptation for human access to dynamic
ecosystems.
The Qing state sought not to eliminate the diversity of adaptation
throughout its borderland order, but to take all adaptations into its
service as environmental subjects,produced through a structure of
administrative control under conditions of both cultural and ecological
change. The identity constructs of a Qing environmentality would
be the agents who embodied a“Qingspace”triple-trunked dragon’s
true lair of Manchu forests, Mongol steppes and Zomian mountains
from hide-bound Warka, free-range Chakhar, and gumlao ridden
Kachin zones.
270 Across Forest, Steppe, and Mountain