224
EXPERIENCE
BY ITSELF IS
NOT SCIENCE
EDMUND HUSSERL (1859–1938)
IN CONTEXT
BRANCH
Ontology
APPROACH
Phenomenology
BEFORE
5th century BCE Socrates
uses argument to try to
answer philosophical
questions with certainty.
17th century René Descartes
uses doubt as a starting point
for his philosophical method.
1874 Franz Brentano, Husserl’s
teacher, claims that philosophy
needs a new scientific method.
AFTER
From 1920s Martin
Heidegger, Husserl’s student,
develops his teacher’s method
of phenomenology, leading to
the birth of existentialism.
From 1930s Husserl’s
phenomenology reaches
France, influencing thinkers
such as Emmanuel Levinas
and Maurice Merleau-Ponty.
H
usserl was a philosopher
haunted by a dream that
has preoccupied thinkers
since the time of the ancient
Greek philosopher Socrates: the
dream of certainty. For Socrates,
the problem was this: although we
easily reach agreement on questions
about things we can measure (for
example, “how many olives are
there in this jar?”), when it comes
to philosophical questions such
as “what is justice?” or “what is
beauty?”, it seems that there is no
clear way of reaching agreement.
And if we cannot know for certain
what justice is, then how can we
say anything about it at all?
The problem of certainty
Husserl was a philosopher who
started life as a mathematician.
He dreamed that problems such as
“what is justice?” might be solved
with the same degree of certainty
with which we are able to solve
mathematical problems such as
“how many olives are in the jar?” In
other words, he hoped to put all the
sciences—by which he meant all
branches of human knowledge and
activity, from math, chemistry,
and physics to ethics and politics –
on a completely secure footing.
So experience
by itself is
not science.
Science aspires to
certainty about the world.
But science is empirical:
it depends upon
experience.
Experience is subject to
assumptions and biases.