OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS
Demosthenes and Isocrates Address Philip of Macedonia
Among the Greeks, the statesman Demosthenes reacted most
strongly to the growing strength and expansionary policies of
the Macedonian king Philip II. Demosthenes delivered a series
of orations to the Athenian assembly in which he portrayed
Philip as a ruthless and barbaric man. The first selection is
from Demosthenes’sThird Philippic, delivered around 341
B.C.E. Isocrates saw Philip in a different light and appealed to
him to lead both Greeks and Macedonians in a war against
the Persians. The second selection is from Isocrates’sAddress
to Philip,writtenin346B.C.E.
Demosthenes,The Third Philippic
I observe, however, that all men, and you first of all, have
conceded to him something which has been the occasion
of every war that the Greeks have ever waged. And what
is that? The power of doing what he likes, of calmly plun-
dering and stripping the Greeks one by one, and of attack-
ing their cities and reducing them to slavery. Yet your
hegemony in Greece lasted seventy-three years, that of
Sparta twenty-nine, and in these later times Thebes too
gained some sort of authority after the battle of Leuctra.
But neither to you nor to the Thebans nor to the Spartans
did the Greeks ever yet, men of Athens, concede the right
of unrestricted action, or anything like it. On the con-
trary, when you, or rather the Athenians of that day, were
thought to be showing a want of consideration in dealing
with others, all felt it their duty, even those who had no
grievanceagainstthem,togotowarinsupportofthose
who had been injured.... Yet all the faults committed by
the Spartans in those thirty years, and by our ancestors
in their seventy years of supremacy, are fewer, men of
Athens, than the wrongs which Philip has done to the
Greeks in the thirteen incomplete years in which he has
been coming to the top—or rather, they are not a fraction
of them.... Ay, and you know this also, that the wrongs
which the Greeks suffered from the Spartans or from us,
they suffered at all events at the hands of true-born sons
of Greece, and they might have been regarded as the acts
of a legitimate son, born to great possessions, who should
be guilty of some fault or error in the management of his
estate: so far he would deserve blame and reproach, yet it
could not be said that it was not one of the blood, not the
lawful heir who was acting thus. But if some slave or ille-
gitimate bastard had wasted and squandered what he had
no right to, heavens! How much more monstrous and
exasperating all would have called it! Yet they have no
such qualms about Philip and his present conduct, though
he is not only no Greek, nor related to the Greeks, but
not even a barbarian from any place that can be named
with honor, but a pestilent knave from Macedonia, from
where it was never yet possible to buy a decent slave.
Isocrates,Address to Philip
IchosetoaddresstoyouwhatIhavetosay....Iamgoing
to advise you to champion the cause of concord among the
Hellenes and of a campaign against the barbarians; and as
persuasion will be helpful in dealing with the Hellenes, so
compulsion will be useful in dealing with the barbarians....
I affirm that, without neglecting any of your own
interests, you ought to make an effort to reconcile
Argos and Sparta and Thebes and Athens; for if you
can bring these cities together, you will not find it hard
to unite the others as well....
You see how utterly wretched these states have become
because of their warfare, and how like they are to men
engaged in a personal encounter; for no one can reconcile the
parties to a quarrel while their wrath is rising; but after they
have punished each other badly,theyneednomediator,but
separate of their own accord. And that is just what I think
these states also will do unless you first take them in hand....
Now regarding myself, and regarding the course which
you should take toward the Hellenes, perhaps no more
need be said. But as to the expedition against Asia, we shall
urge upon the cities which I have called upon you to recon-
cile that it is their duty to go to war with the barbarians.
Q What are Demosthenes’s criticisms of Philip II? What
appeal does Isocrates make to Philip? What do these
documents tell you about the persistent factionalism
and communal tensions within the Greek world? In
light of subsequent events, who—Demosthenes or
Isocrates—made the stronger argument? Why?
Sources: Demosthenes,The Third Philippic. Reprinted by permission of the publishers and the Trustees of the Loeb Classical Library fromDemosthenes, Loeb Classical Library Vol. I, trans. by
J.H. Vince, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, copyrightª1930, by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. The Loeb Classical Library is a registered trademark of the
President and Fellows of Harvard College. Isocrates,Address to Philip. Reprinted by permission of the publishers and the Trustees of the Loeb Classical Library fromIsocrates, vol. 1, Loeb
Classical Library Vol. 209, translated by George Norlin, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Copyrightª1928, by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. The Loeb Classical
Library is a registered trademark of the President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Macedonia and the Conquests of Alexander 75
Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
`Ìi`ÊÜÌ
ÊÌ
iÊ`iÊÛiÀÃÊvÊ
vÝÊ*ÀÊ*Ê
`ÌÀÊ
/ÊÀiÛiÊÌ
ÃÊÌVi]ÊÛÃÌ\Ê