Justice among Nations. A History of International Law - Stephen C. Neff

66. Ibid.


67. See Kenneth Boulding, Th e Meaning of the Twentieth Century: Th e Great Transi-
    tion (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1965), 135– 36.


68. See Study Group of the International Law Commission, Fragmentation of Inter-
    national Law: Diffi culties Arising from the Diversifi cation and Expansion of Interna-
    tional Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 (2006), 65– 115.


69. See Chapter 9.


70. Study Group of the ILC, Fragmentation, at 244– 56. See also Report of ILC on
    58th Sess., 2 (pt. 2) [2006] Y.B. ILC, UN Doc. A/61 /10 (2006), 400– 23.


71. Study Group of the ILC, Fragmentation, at 249.


72. Benedict Kingsbury, “Th e Administrative Law Frontier in Global Governance,”
    99 ASIL Procs. 143– 53 (2005), 143; and Benedict Kingsbur y, Nico Krisch, and Richard
    B. Stewart, “Th e Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” [2005] L. and Cont. Prob.
    15– 61, 19– 20.


73. Jeff rey L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman, “A Functional Approach to International
    Legal Constitutionalization,” in Jeff ery L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman, eds., Ruling the
    World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, 69– 109 (Cam-
    bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 33– 34.


74. David Kennedy, “A New Stream of International Law Scholarship,” 7 Wis. Int’l
    L. J. 1– 49 (1988), 9.


75. Ibid., 8.


76. David Kennedy, “Th eses about International Legal Discourse,” 23 GYBIL 353–
    91 (1980), 390.


77. Ibid., 390– 91.


78. Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: Th e Structure of Legal Argument
    (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 554.


79. Ibid., 552– 54.


80. Ibid., 555.


81. Ibid., 560.


82. David Kennedy, “Th e Mystery of Global Governance,” in Dunoff and Tracht-
    man, eds., Ruling the World, 64.


83. Ibid., 54.


84. See Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia, 71– 94.


85. David Kennedy, Th e Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humani-
    tarianism (Prince ton, NJ: Prince ton University Press, 2004), 15– 16.


86. Ibid., 22– 23.


87. Kennedy, “New Stream,” 47– 48.


88. “McDougal’s Jurisprudence: Utility, Infl uence, Controversy,” 79 ASIL Procs.
    266– 88 (1985), 286.


89. Nigel Purvis, “Critical Legal Studies in Public International Law,” 32 Harvard
    Int’l L. J. 81– 127 (1991), 120– 27.


90. See Chapter 2.

556 Notes to Pages 456–462