18773 sssa, f. 419, op. 1, 1881, d. 1, Delo “Zhurnaly,” ll. 5–11; ibid., d. 3, Delo
“Perepiska,” ll. 47–9.
74 “soplis mgudlis tserili tavis motsmetadmi,” mtskemsi, no. 30 (30 October
1886): 2; “K pamiati pokoinago arkheologa D.Z. Bakradze,” Pastyr’,
nos.9–10 (1890): 7–8.
75 sssa, f. 493, op. 1, 1905, d. 1108, I. Aleksei, l. 38.
76 Bakradze, Arkheologicheskoe puteshestvie po Gurii i Adchare.
77 ingalo janashvili, “istoriuli da geograpiuli agtsera heretisa,” mogzauri,
nos. 1–4 (1903):67.
78 z. mtatsmindeli, “khalkhis hazri karsze da batumze,” droeba, no. 218
(16December 1877):2.
79 “khevsurebis chveneba imat mitsa-tsulis shesakheb kavkasiis keds ikit,”
krebuli, no. 7 (1872):133–41.
80 Rogger, National Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century Russia, 126–85.
81 Belinskii, “Literaturnye mechtaniia,” in Belinskii, pss, 92;
Frank, Dostoevsky: The Years of Ordeal, 1850–1859, 228–33; Frank,
Dostoevsky: The Stir of Liberation, 1860–1865, 104–5; Pypin, Istoriia
Russkoi literatury, 4: 626; Vengerov, Ocherki po istorii Russkoi literatury,
413–16; Gleason, Young Russia, 1–4; 32–76; Slezkine, Arctic Mirrors, 75.
For discussions of ethnography and its relationship to colonialism in
other parts of the world, see Hymes, Reinventing Anthropology; Asad, An-
thropology & the Colonial Encounter; Kuper, Anthropologists and Anthropol-
ogy, 123–49. On French ethnography and French colonial policy in
Morocco in the early twentieth century, see Burke iii, “Fez, the Setting
Sun of Islam.” For discussions of ethnography as a form of self-reflexive
fiction, see Clifford and Marcus, Writing Culture; Clifford, The Predicament
of Culture; Marcus and Fischer, Anthropology as Cultural Critique. For the
traditional Soviet approach to ethnography, see Tokarev, Istoriia Russkoi
etnografii. On ethnography sponsored by the Naval Ministry, see Clay,
“Russian Ethnographers in the Service of Empire, 1856–1862.” On
ethnography and the Geographic Society, see Knight, “Science, Empire,
and Nationality.”
82 Note the “Program” used by Efimenko, Sbornik Narodnykh Iuridicheskikh
obychaev Arkhangel’skoi Gubernii, 305–29.
83 a.k., “mtserloba,” droeba, no. 32 (28 March 1876):1.
84 A. Zisserman, “Poezdka v Shatil,” Kavkaz, no. 18 (3 May 1847):69;
A.Zisserman, “Poezdka v s. Tioanety,” Kavkaz, no. 20 (17 May 1847):77;
Arnol’d Ziserman [sic], “Iz moikh zapisok,” Kavkaz, no. 22 (1 June 1846):
- For Marlinsky’s descriptions of combat, see “Pis’ma iz Dagestana,”
17–19, and “Pokhod v Dagestan General-Ad’iutanta Pankrat’eva v 1831
godu,” 25–6, 31, 52, in Bestuzhev-Marlinskii, Sochineniia v dvukh
tomakh,vol. 2. On Marlinsky and ethnographic description, see Layton,
Notes to pages 70–1