Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions. Yu Hyongwon and the Late Choson Dynasty - James B. Palais

(Darren Dugan) #1
NOTES TO CHAPTER I I02 I


  1. Peter Bol has preferred "pattern" over "principle" as a translation of i (Ii in Chi-
    nese). Pcter K. Bol, "This Culture of Ours": Intellectual Transitiolls ill Till1g and Sung
    China (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1992).

  2. I havc choscn "psycho-physical energy" instead of Cars un Ch'ang's "matter" or Wing-
    tsit Chan's "material forcc" as a translation for ki (ch 'i in Chinese). See Carsun Chang,
    The Development otNco-Confucian Thought, 2 vols. (New York: Bookman Associates,
    1957, 1962); Hoyt Cleveland Tillman, Utilitarian Con/ilcianislIl: Ch 'ell Liang's Chal-
    lenge to Chu Hsi (Cambridge: Council on EastAsian Studies, Harvard University, 1982);
    Wing-tsit Chan, A Sourcebook ill Chinese Philosoph,. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Uni-
    versity Press, 1963).

  3. Pan'gye sonsaeng yonbo (Seoul: Tongguk munhwasa, 1961), pp. 6-7.

  4. Pan 'gye chapko (Seoul: Yogang ch'ulp'ansa, 1990).
    II. Yi Usong, "Ch'ogi Sirhak kwa songnihak kwa ili kwan'gye: Pan'gye Yu Hyongwon
    ili kyong'u" [The relationship between early practical learning and the learning of nature
    and principlc]. Tongbangh{lk chi 58 (June 1989):15-22.

  5. Kim Chunsok, "Yu Hyongwon iii pyonbOpkwan kwa silliron," p. 72.

  6. Ibid., pp. 94-1<>4.

  7. Ihid., pp. 104-9.

  8. Lcszek Kolakowski, "Mind and Body: Ideology and Economy in thc Collapse of
    Communism," in Kazimierz A. Poznanski, ed., Constructing Capitalism: The Reemer-
    gence of Civil Society and Liberal Economy in the Post-Communist "hrld (Boulder, Colo.:
    Westview Press, 1992), pp. IO-I3.


CHAPTER I. Confucian Statecraft in the Founding of Choson

I. Min Hyon 'gu, "Sin Ton i:ii chipkwon kwa kil chongch' ijok sonkyok" [Sin Ton's admin-
istration and its political nature], Yoksa hakpo 38 (August 1968):49. John Duncan has
provided a very useful discussion of the power and functions of the late Koryo monarchs
and thc domination of the great official families of the capital in latc Kory6, the families
that I prefer to label yangban. See his manuscript, "The Kory6 Origins of the Choson
Dynasty," submitted to the University of Washington Prcss. 1993.


  1. Martina Deuehler, The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and
    Ideology (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, I992).

  2. Chong Tojon, Sambongjip (Seoul: Kuksa p'yonch'an wiwonhoe, 196I); James B.
    Palais, review of Han Yong'u, Ch{)ng Tojiln sasang iii yon 'gu [A study of the thought of
    ChOng TojonJ (Seoul: Han'guk munhwa yon'guso, 1973), Journal of Korean Studies 2
    (198o):I99- 2 44.

  3. The sources for this section are too numerous to list, but for an English account,
    see Ki-baik Lee fYi Kiback J, A New History of Korea, trans. by Edward W. Wagner (Cam-
    bridge: Harvard Univcrsity Press, I984).

  4. Chtlllg Tojon, "Chason kyonggukehOn, ha" [Institutcs for the management of the
    state, pt. 21. Sambongjip (Seoul: Kuksa p'yonch'an wiw6nhoe, 196 I), p. 218.

  5. Kang Man'gil, "Sugong'()p" [Handicrafts], Han 'guksa 10, Chosiin: Yanghan kwal-
    /yo kukka iii sa/we kujo [Hi~tory of Korea, 1 n, Choson: The social structure of the yang-

Free download pdf