NOTES TO CHAPTER 6 1065
ture of Klimhwa County in the Late Seventeenth Century," Occasional Papers on Korea,
no, I (April, 1974), p, 14, Ellen Kim found that the matrilineal rule was not fully observed
in her study, "The Enduring Institution: A Case Study of Slavery in Traditional Korea"
(B.A. thesis, Harvard College, 1991).
- Sukchong sWok 21 A9b, Sukchong 15. I2.ilrhaek (13th day), cited in Hiraki, Cho.w)n
hugi nohije y()n 'gu, p. 136, n. 22. - Hiraki Makoto, "1Ushichi-hachi seiki ni okeru nury6sai shosei," pp. 55-61; Hiraki,
Chos()n hugi nobije y()n' gu, pp. 134-36. For proposals made in 1680 see Sukchong sil-
10k I l:lla, Sukchong 7. r.kyong'o. On this day, Min Chongjung praised the effective-
ness of the matrilineal rule for producing more men of good status for the state and the
wisdom ofYulgok for proposing the idea. For proposals made in 1684 see Sukchong sil-
10k 15,ha:32b-33a, Sukchong 10. Io.ilrmyo (1684); for rescission of the law in 1689 see
Sukchong sillok 2I:49b, Sukchong 15.12.ilrhaek.
For a discussion ofthe history of the matrilineal rule from 1669 to 173 I, see also Chon
Hyongt'aek, "Sipkusegich'o naesinobi lii hyokp'a" [Changes in government slaves in the
early nineteenth century], Han 'guksaron 4 (March 1978):204-I I. Chon emphasized the
factional basis for the dispute over the matrilineal law. - Yr'jngjo sillok 27:25a, Yongjo 6.9. pyongsul, cited in Hiraki Makoto, "1Ushichi-
hachi seiki ni okeru nury6sai shosei," pp. 69-72. See also Yi Sangbaek, "Ch'onja sumogo,"
p. 176; Chon Hyongt'aek, "Sipkusegich'o naesinobi ili hyokp'a," pp. 208-10. - Hiraki, "1Ushichi hachi seiki," p. 74.
- Kim Yongsop, "Yang'an ili yon'gu: Choson hugi ili nonka kyongje" [A study of
the land registers: The peasant households in the late Choson dynasty], in idem, Cho.\'{)n
hugi nong'()psa y()n 'gu I (Seoul: Ilchogak, 1970): 164. - Chon Hyongt'aek, "Sipkusegich'o naesinobi lii hyokp'a," pp. 192-2°4; Kim
Yongsop, "Choson hugi sinbunje lii tongyo wa nongji soyu" [The shakeup of the status
system and the ownership of agricultural land in late ChosonJ, in idem, Chos()n hugi
nongopsa y()n' gu: nongch 'on ky()ngje, sahoe py()ndong [Studies in the agricultural his-
tory of late Choson: The village economy and social change] (Seoul: Ilchogak, 1970),
PP·4^2 4-^26. - Hiraki, Chos()n hugi nobije Yeln 'gu, pp. 165-8 I, discusses different types of man-
umission by purchase or merit and prices by age category in the seventeenth and eigh-
teenth centuries. Chon Hyongt'aek, Chos()n hugi nohi sinhun Yeln 'gu, chap. 2 and pp.
188-2or; Kim Yongmo, "Choson hugi ili sinbun kujo wa kil pyondong," pp. 127-33. - The official was Yun Tongdo, SJW 1 192, p. 686d, Yongjo 37 -4. I 7, cited in Chon
Hyongt'aek, "Sipkusegich'o naesinobi ili hyokp'a," p. 203. - For a full discussion of the sources, see Chon Hyongt'aek, "Sipkusegich'o
naesinobi lii hyokp'a," pp. 2 I I -13. For the reference to Hong Ponghan's statement in
1761, see SJW 1200, p. I92a, Yongjo 37.12.1 (1761). The record ofYi Ikp'o's scold-
ing of Hong Ponghan is in Song Taejung's Ch ongs()ngjip, cited in Chon Hyongt'aek,
p.212. - Ellen Kim, "Enduring Institution," pp. 87-88.
- Shikata Hiroshi, "Richo jinko ni kansuru mibun kaikyiibetsuteki kansatsu" [An
investigation ofYi dynasty population in terms of status and class], in Chosen teikoku