The EconomistNovember 16th 2019 31
1
R
arely do germans celebrate such
measly growth. But the country had
spent so long fearing a slide into recession
that even its third-quarter expansion of
0.1%, announced on November 14th, felt
like a success. After the economy shrank by
0.2% in the second quarter, strong domes-
tic demand and a surprisingly good export
performance were enough to avoid Ger-
many’s first technical recession since 2013.
Still, the country’s long boom, in which
well over 4 m jobs have been created in ten
years, is plainly over.
The fear of looming recession has re-
vived a familiar debate in Germany: should
the government spend more to ward off
danger? Under the so-called schwarze Null
(“black zero”) policy, Germany’s budget has
been in surplus since 2014. Last year, aided
by booming employment and low debt-
service costs, it ran to a whopping 1.9% of
gdp. In some quarters the black zero has
acquired an almost fetishistic quality. Visi-
tors to a wing of the finance ministry in the
state of Hesse can marvel at “Null” (2016),
an installation of interlocking black alumi-
nium circles suspended from the ceiling.
But as Germany’s infrastructure needs
have grown, as its borrowing costs have
plummeted (the yield on Bunds out to ten
years is negative) and as the economy has
slowed, mulish adherence to a balanced-
budget policy has become harder to de-
fend. “Coffers full, country broken!” la-
mented a recent cover of Stern, a weekly,
above a picture of a potholed road. In
wealthy states, dilapidated schools have
been closed for fear of collapse. The state
development bank puts Germany’s munic-
ipal investment backlog at €138bn ($152bn).
A rotating cast of international institutions
passes through Berlin, urging ministers to
turn on the spending taps.
Since March 2018 the finance ministry
has been in the hands of Olaf Scholz, a cen-
trist Social Democrat. Yet hopes for a much
more expansive fiscal policy have been
dashed. The black zero was written into the
coalition deal between Angela Merkel’s
Christian Democrats (cdu) and Mr Scholz’s
spd. Big government programmes, such as
a recent package to reduce Germany’s car-
bon emissions, are designed to satisfy fis-
cal rules rather than the other way around.
Mr Scholz, who is running for the spd
leadership and wants to succeed Mrs Mer-
kel as chancellor, argues that steady fiscal
stewardship has left the country well
placed to react to a severe downturn. (The
yardstick would probably be a marked up-
tick in unemployment.) The response, say
officials, would partly follow the tactics
used in the 2008-09 crisis. Automatic sta-
bilisers, such as unemployment benefits,
would kick in. Social-security subsidies
would make it easier for firms to cut work-
ers’ hours; adjusting tax rules on deprecia-
tion would aim to ginger up private invest-
ment. Finance-ministry officials say that
they will dispense with the black zero if
necessary. Mrs Merkel, for all her homilies
about the state living within its means, is
unlikely to resist. Mr Scholz draws compar-
isons to 2008-09, when Germany mobil-
ised €50bn. “In a real crisis, we’ll spend
money like hell,” says an official.
Germany
Are the black zero’s days numbered?
BERLIN
Germany’s fiscal debate is livelier than ever. But don’t expect a splurge
*Forecast
Not much to worry about
Source: European Commission
Germany, % of GDP
General government
gross debt
Budget balance
0
20
40
60
80
1995 2005 19*
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
1992 2005 19*
Europe
32 Elections in Spain
33 Ireland’s compensation culture
33 Leonardo da Vinci’s wine
34 Charlemagne: Reading the cards
Also in this section