32 Europe The EconomistNovember 16th 2019
2 One worry is that the slump will not be
bad enough to trigger meaningful action.
Another, says Jens Südekum, an econom-
ics professor at Heinrich-Heine-University
Düsseldorf, is that a late, hastily imple-
mented stimulus could cut against Ger-
many’s long-term investment and restruc-
turing needs. For example, subsidies or tax
cuts could encourage car companies to
keep plugging old technologies. Mr Süde-
kum is among a growing number of econo-
mists who want Germany to exploit low
borrowing costs to fund a multi-year trans-
formative public investment plan. Yet even
were the government to dispense with the
black zero it would run into the “debt
brake”, a constitutional ban on structural
deficits over 0.35% of gdp designed to tie
the hands of spendthrift politicians. The fi-
nance ministry estimates this headroom
would allow for only €6.5bn in fresh spend-
ing next year, barely 0.2% of gdp.
Various wheezes have been proposed to
get around this, including off-balance-
sheet vehicles linked to public bodies like
universities or housing associations that
can tap markets without violating the debt
brake. A more ambitious approach, pro-
posed by the Green Party, would ditch the
black zero and complement the debt brake
with an investment rule that would exploit
less stringent euregulations. The Greens
think this could kick-start public invest-
ment worth €35bn a year. But it would re-
quire a tricky constitutional change.
Some Germans have tired of foreign
criticism. Public investment grew by 3.8%
last year, they point out (although it re-
mains below the euro-zone average, and is
too low even to maintain the capital stock).
Eckhardt Rehberg, who is leading the cdu
in discussions over next year’s budget, says
capacity constraints and red tape make it
hard to spend more without accelerating
costs in construction. Local governments
often fail to spend allocated funds as it is.
In Germany’s tight labour market, compa-
nies cannot meet orders, and a chronically
understaffed public-sector workforce
struggles to manage them. Critics counter
that a long-term targeted investment
scheme, rather than the stop-start pro-
grammes of recent years, would provide
firms with the guarantees they need to ex-
pand capacity.
Such rows will not end soon. Mean-
while the outlook is uncertain. Germany’s
export-heavy economy remains exposed to
risks like a no-deal Brexit and the uncer-
tainty around America’s trade spat with
China. “German business expectations
have fallen off a cliff,” according to ihs
Markit, a research firm. The European
Commission thinks German growth will
outpace only Italy’s in 2020. Amid such
worries, critics will continue to decry the
German government’s tightfistedness. The
chances are that it will continue to resist. 7
I
n septemberPedro Sánchez, Spain’s act-
ing prime minister, said that if he agreed
to a coalition between his Socialists and
Podemos, a farther-left party, he “wouldn’t
sleep at night”. Two months later, just
hours after an election on November 10th
in which both parties lost ground while the
hard right surged, Mr Sánchez and Pablo
Iglesias, Podemos’s leader, signed an out-
line agreement to form Spain’s first co-
alition government since the 1930s. Many
details are lacking and the deal is not itself
enough to guarantee a majority in Con-
gress. But after their fourth general elec-
tion in as many years, Spaniards may be
spared a fifth, at least for a couple of years.
The Socialists have emerged again as
the largest party, but with only 120 of the
350 seats in Congress, down three on the
previous vote in April. Podemos lost seven
seats (two to a splinter party). Between
them, the pair mustered almost 1.4m fewer
votes, partly because turnout fell by six
points and partly because of continuing
fragmentation, as an unprecedented 16
parties won seats in Congress.
The big change was that Vox, a hard-
right Spanish nationalist party, surged into
third place with 15% of the vote. Its rise
came partly at the expense of Ciudadanos,
a rudderless formerly centrist party, which
was almost wiped out. Albert Rivera, its
founding leader, resigned. The voters thus
punished, to varying degrees, those they
held responsible for failing to form a gov-
ernment after the April poll. That was
when Mr Rivera deprived the country of its
only realistic prospect of a strong, reform-
ist administration by setting his face
against an agreement with Mr Sánchez.
Chastened by his pyrrhic victory, Mr
Sánchez chose to eat his words and accept a
coalition in which Mr Iglesias would prob-
ably be a deputy prime minister and have
two or three other ministries. The two have
disagreed about the economy and about
Catalonia, the biggest issues facing Spain.
Mr Iglesias wants to squeeze the rich and
repeal a labour reform which made firms
more competitive. Mr Sánchez has at-
tempted to assuage the concerns of busi-
ness folk by saying he will put Nadia Cal-
viño, his fiscally sober economy minister,
in overall charge of economic matters. Po-
demos may kick against her.
The campaign was dominated by the
conflict in Catalonia, after the Supreme
Court last month imposed swingeing pri-
son sentences on nine Catalan separatist
leaders for their role in the illegal referen-
dum and declaration of independence in
October 2017. That prompted sometimes
violent protests which continued this
week with the blocking of motorways in
Catalonia. The separatists’ threat to nation-
al unity has fuelled the rise of Vox, which
wants to limit Spain’s sweeping regional
autonomy. It also loudly complains about
illegal immigrants claiming welfare bene-
fits (though few do).
Podemos has hitherto backed the sepa-
ratists’ demand for a referendum on inde-
pendence. The draft coalition agreement
calls for the government merely to pro-
mote talks “always within the constitu-
tion”, which does not recognise a right to
self-determination. To scrape together the
majority needed to form a government, Mr
Sánchez must now rely on the support of
regional parties and, probably, the absten-
tion of some Catalan separatists. Given the
climate in Catalonia, that will not be easy.
For now, the prime minister appears to
have rejected a second option, to seek an
agreement with the mainstream conserva-
tive People’s Party, the Socialists’ age-old ri-
vals. That is not clearly on offer, but most
leaders accept that the country’s political
deadlock needs to be broken. To resort to
yet another election would be “dangerous-
ly badly received by Spanish society” and
would lead to even greater fragmentation
and stir up still more support for Vox, says
José Luis Ayllón of Llorente y Cuenca, a po-
litical consultancy. That prospect should
concentrate minds. 7
MADRID
It prompts a first step towards a
left-cum-regionalist government
Spain’s election
An electio-shock
The elusive majority
Source: Ministry of Interior
Spain, general election results, seats in Congress
November 2019
April 2019
Podemos
35 Socialists 120 Others 44 10 People’s Party 89 Vox 52
Ciudadanos
Majority
42 123 38 57 66 24