An
Explanationof
MilitarySlavery 83old
lifestyle.Cattlenomadswhocontinued
herdingmostoftenretainedtheiroldabilities;althoughtheirlocale
changed,theiractivitiesremainedthesame,sotheirdescendentsstayed
hardyand
foughtwell.The
unreliabilityofthesesoldiers
laynotintheir
militaryaptitudebutintheir
politicalunruliness.Asvictorious
troops,the
marginalareasoldierswho
broughtadynastyto
powerfelt
privileged; theyand theirdescendents
placedgreatdemandson
therulerandconsideredthemselvesentitledtowhateverhe
gave
them.
Thesesoldiersconsideredtherulerintheirdebtandtoleratedhim
only
asanarbiter.
Theypressedhimforconcessions,
squabbledamongthemselves,andobeyed
him
onlywhenit
suitedthem.Inshort,therulercouldnot
impose
hiswillonthembuthadto
toleratethemasaninde-pendent
force.Withtime,however,therulerwouldfindtheirattitudesand
power
intolerableashe
increasinglytookonthere-sponsibilitiesand
challenges
ofa
sovereign.Especiallywhenthe
marginal
areasoldiersweretheruler’s
kinsmendid
theygrowfatandclamor
loudly
for
privileges,sohewasforcedto
severhis
dependence
onthem:"Arulercanachieve
poweronlywiththe
help
ofhis
ownpeople
[Eventually,however,]therulershowshimself
independentofhis
people,
claimsallthe
gloryforhimself,and
pushes
his
peopleawayfromit
withthe
palms(ofhis hands). As aresult,his own
people
become, in
fact,hisenemies.
’’63Therefore,aboutthree
generationsafterthe
foundingofadynasty,
someofthe
grandsonsofwarriors
lapsedintocomfort-ableindolence andothers made
unacceptable claims on the
ruler.Asthedescendentsof
marginal
areasoldiersbecameun-reliable,
the
armyhadto
lessenits
dependenceonthemandre-place
themwithnew
troops.Inorderto
preventthem[his
people]from
seizingpower,andinorder
tokeepthem
awayfrom
participation(in
power),therulerneedsotherfriends,
notof
hisownskin,whomhecanuseagainst(hisown
people)andwhowillbehisfriendsin
theirplace.These(newfriends)becomeclosertohimthan
anyoneelse.n463.
Muq,1:372.64.Ibid.