18
TheIslamicateContextmangrand vizierswereslaves,subject
tothemerestwhimoftheirmasters,the
pdish{ths(sultans).When
apdishhsowished,hecouldreducethe
grandviziertoakitchenaideorhavehimexecuted;
yet,
atthesametime, the
grandvizierdirectedthegovernment
ofaworld power. Aslongas he personally re-
mainedunder his master’scontrol,
nothingelse affectedhisstatusasatrueslave.
Insum,thefactthata
personisatrueslavetellsusnothingabouthis
power,
wealth,orsocial
standing.Tobe
sure,mostslavesweredebasedand
poor;
but
theydidnothavetobe,and
notallwere.As
long
asaslavehadamasterwhocontrolledhim,hecould
gainanyposition--short,
of
course,of
sovereign,sincethe
rulerhadnomortalmaster.This
potentialofthetrueslavewasnowhereso
fullyexploited
asinIslamdom.LeavingSlaveryTrue
slaveryendswhena
personacquirescontroloverhisownvitaldecisions.This
changecanoccureitherwith
orwithoutthemaster’s consent. Manumission, a
legalandsocial event an-nouncing
thatamaster
voluntarilyrelinquishescontroloverhisslave,isthenormal
wayof
becomingfree.
Amongallbutmili-taryslaves,thisisthe
onlywayof
sheddingthemaster’scontrol(shortof
rebellingor
runningaway);theyneedhisconsent.Militaryslaveshaveanother
wayof
gainingcontrolovertheirown
major
decisionswithout
permission.As
professionalsol-diersand
powerful
officials,
theyhavetheirown
powerbaseandopportunities
far
beyondthoseofotherslaves.Their
militaryrole
gives
themameansof
escapingslavery--andtheyregularlyexploitit. Militaryslaves
manumitthemselvesasamatterofcourse.
Notermin
Englishdescribesthis
processofself-manumission,sinceitdoesnotoccurinWesterncivilization.Yet,becauseitisa
basicfeatureof
militaryslavery,
weneedanameforit.
Byext6n-sionfrom"manumission,"Ishallcallit
"ipsimission."
Andincontrasttothetrueslave
(under
hismaster’s
control)andthefreedman
(legallymanumitted),Ishallassumethatthe"formerslave" freedhimself
throughipsimission.
Inother
words,theformerslaveneednotbemanumitted.