WhatIsa
MilitarySlave?
19Depending
on theirspecific circumstances, then,
militaryslaves
mayeitherbetrueslaves
ornot.An
analysisoftheir
posi-tion
must take into account the
changes
they undergo.Ingeneral,
militaryslaves
begintheirserviceto
a
dynastyastrueslavesand
gainpartialorfull
independenceover
time.
Again,the
extentofthemaster’scontrolis
thekeyfactor;
theyaretrueslavesas
longasamastercansellthemand
makesthevitaldeci-sionsintheir
lives.If
theyhavenosuch master
theyarenolonger
trueslaves.Itisonly
theirrelationswiththe
masterthatdeterminetheirstatusas
slaves;otherconsiderationshaveno
ef-fectonthis
status.
Seb/iktigin,a
miliaryslavewholater
foundedtheGhaznaviddynasty,explainedwhat
beinga
trueslavemeant:"TheMasterhadnot
commandedusto
fight;ifwehad
fought
withoutthe Master’s
orders,then
eachoneofuswouldhavebeen
amasternotaslave,forthemark
ofaslaveisthathedoesonly
whathis
mastertellshim.’’24Some writers contest
the
servilityofthese men.
Papouliadoubts
thattheir
relationshiptotheir
masterwasatrueslave-masterbond. She
points to awider
patternof
relations be-tweenanabsolute
rulerandhissubordinates:Otherfactorsalso
playedaroleherebesidesthestatusofthe
[slave]nobles.Thisisa
phenomenonwhichis
alwayspossibleunder
ab-solute
rule.Blindsubmissionresultedfrom
theireducation,fromthetimewhen
theydidserveastrueslaves,andit
wasmoreofareligiousthana
political
principle.2Intruth,
regardlessofother
circumstances,thesemenaretrueslavesbecause
theycanbe
disposedof
bytheirmasterand
theymust
obeyhim.Theyremaintrueslaves
regardlessofwhoelsesharesthis
submission.Our
concernhereiswith
militaryslaves;if
itturnsoutthatothersinthe
courtsharetheir
servility,
thisdoesnotaltertheir
ownstatus.Ifthemaster’s
powersasabso-
luteruler
complementthoseas
slavemaster,thenthey
only
in-creasehiscontroloverthe
slavesandmakethemservilein
more,
notfewer,
ways.
Alternatively,onecansee
militaryslavesasa
typeofmerce-nary;
butas
longas
theyaretrueslaves,this
viewdoesnot
help24.Ni.zimal-Mulk,
pp.126/105-106.25.Papoulia,
p.8 24.Thefinalassertionis
highlydubious.