SlavesinWar:TheHistorical
Record 37continuedto
fightonhorsebackalongsidetheirowners,andthissystemwasnotdiscardeduntiltheseventeenth
century,whenmostslaveswere
ultimatelyrelegatedto
guardingthe
baggagetrain,nFinally,
inthe
eighteenthcentury,"theslaveswere
displacedbypeasant
recruits.TM"Oneof
theminorissuesinRussian
historiography"revolvesaround the
question
oftheslaves’
militaryrole in
Muscovy.Somethink
theyfought
alongsidetheir
masters,others
saythat"they
had
largelynoncombat,secondary
roles,suchasaccom-panying
and
guardingthe
baggagetrain,
keepingthehorses,gettingfoodandfodder,andsoon.
’’2Whatevertheirexactrolewas,
andhowevernumeroustheslaveswere,
it
isclear
theydidnothavethe
importantfunctionsof
militaryslaves.TheManchus.
TheChinesethemselvesmadealmostnouseofslavesassoldiers
(thoughgiventheirlowestimationofthemili-taryasacareer,it
mightseem
likely).Theone
approachtoanorganized
useofslavesinwartook
placewhentheManchus
werein
theprocessof
conqueringChina.The Manchus, a semibarbarian
peoplewhose habitat ex-
tendedfromtheforestsofManchuria
tothenorthofChina,unitedunderNurhaciin 1613 andbegan
a
vigorousattackonthe
Minggovernment
ofChinain1618;
by1621
theyhad
cap-turedseveralChinesecities.
ManyChinesefell
captivetotheManchusandweremadetheirslaves.
At
first,theseslaves
(Man-chu:booi,Chinese:pao-i,usuallytranslatedinto
English"bond-servant")didmostly
menialhouseholdchoresand"wererarely
used in actual
fighting.’’63With time, however,the Manchuleaders found this "loose
systemof
privatelyowned slaves"
deficientfortworeasons:itdidnotallowthemtocentralize
power
nortocontroltheir
manpowerdirectly.Also,"astheMan-
chus
conqueredincreasingamountsof
territorysettled
bytheChineseitbecamea
practicalnecessitytoorganizethe
capturedmeninsome
waythatwasmoreformalthan
allottingthemto
60.Ibid.,p.165;idem,"Muscovite
Slavery,"p.177.61.Hellie,Enserfment,p.221.62.Ibid.,pp.368 n.167,290n.119.63.
Spence,p.7.