38 TheIslamicateContextleadingManchus in
privatebondage. Accordingly,sometimebetween 1615 and 1620,thebondservantswere formedinto
companies
andbattalionsonthe[Manchu]model.
TMThus,en-slavedChinese
captivesoftheManchuswere
systematicallyem-ployed
assoldiersand"assumeda
keyrole..,
as
aides-de-campto
highmilitarycommanders.
’’Two
major differencesdistinguishthis
phenomenonfrommilitaryslavery.Inthefirst
place,theChinesewere
captivesofwar,not
acquiredslaves,and
therewas
nothingplanned
or
sys-tematicintheiruse assoldiers;
theyjoinedthe
fightingonlywhen theManchusconsidered it
propitious.Second,thisar-rangement
lasted
onlya
veryshorttime.
Alreadyinthe
early1630s, full-fledgedChinesebattalions were
formed;as in-creasingnumbers ofChinesecameunderManchu
authority,manyjoinedthe
armyvoluntarilyandweretreatedasfreemen.
Thebondservant
companiesfellinto
decaybythetimeoftheManchu
conquestof
Pekingin1644.WestAfrica.Severalelusivecasescomefromnon-IslamicWest
Africa. The
slave-kingsof the
eighteenth-centuryBambara
dynasty,theTon-Dyon,wereatleast
partiallyMuslim,so
theyfall
underthe
Islamicaterubric.7Otherhintsof
militaryslaverycomefromtheYoruba
kingdominthenineteenth
century.TherewasnostandingYorubaarmy..,manychiefs,especiallyatIbadan...
broughtwiththeir
contingentshousehold
slavestrainedfor
war,these
constitutingthenearest
approachto
regulartroopsamongtheYoruba.s64.
Ibid.,p.8.65.P.M.Torbert,The
ChanglmperialHouseholdDepartment:A
Study
oflOr-ganization
and
PrincipalFunctions,1662-1796(Cambridge,Mass.,1977),
p.55.Seealso
Fang-ch’enMa,"Manchu-Chinese
SocialandEconomicConflictsintheEarly
Ch’ing,"Chinese Social
History,trans. E. Z. Sun andJ.de Francis(Washington,D.C.,1956),pp.340-47.66.
Spence,p.9.67.L.Tauxier,HistoiredesBambara
(Paris,1942),
pp.80-90.68.R.SmithinJ.F.
A.AjayiandR.Smith,YorubaWarfareintheNineteenthCentury,2ded.
(Cambridge,Eng.,1971),
pp.13-14.