AnExplanation
ofMilitarySlavery 55beforethe
appearance
ofIslam;butitdidnot.2Furthermore,military
slaveryoccurredalsoinwetterareassuchassouthernandeastern
India.Turksareoftenassociatedwith militaryslavery,with
goodreason.TheAbbasiduseofslavesoldiers
coincidedwiththeirimportation
ofTurks;Turksservedinalmost
everymilitaryslavecorpsintheMiddleEast andnorthernIndia; andthey
dominated the best-known and
most
spectacular group,theMamluksof
Egypt.Theircloseconnectiontotheinstitutionofmilitaryslaverybothassoldiersandasrulersmakesitreasonable
toconsidertheTurksits
originatorsand
propagators.Twoconsiderationsshow
thatthiswasnotso,however.Thefirstresemblesthe
argumentagainstaclimatic
explanation;ifTurkswerethe
cause,
whydid
militaryslaverynotexistamongTurksoutsideofIslamdom?Turksinthe
pre-IslamicMiddleEastandinnon-Muslimareasdidnot
institute
militaryslavery.Mostnotably,
forcenturies
theyfaced
Byzantiumandnumerousempires
inChinaand
pre-IslamicIran;
theyalsofought
fortheMuslimsfor
150 yearsbefore
becomingmilitaryslaves?Non-
Muslimsmadeeffortsto
incorporateTurksintotheirservice,
yetnonedevisedthe
systemof
militaryslavery.4Nordidthe
systemexistintheTurks’InnerAsianhomelands.
A second
argument againsttheTurkic
explanationcomesfromthe
UmayyaddynastyinSpain.It
appearsthatsimulta-neouslywiththedevelopment
of
militaryslaveryin
Iraqunder
theAbbasids,thisSpanishdynasty
was
independentlymakingsystematicuseofslavesassoldiers.NoTurkswere
presentinearly3d/9th-centurySpain.sLater,
too,sub-Saharan
dynastiesmadeextensiveuseofslave
soldiers,andalmostnoneofthem
wereTurks.Thus,Turkscorrelatemuchlessclearlywithmili-taryslaverythan doesIslam.The
stirrupoffersamuchbetterreasonfor
militaryslavery.Tounderstandhow,Ishallsummarize
LynnWhite,Jr.’s
ideas2.Pp.161-66discussessomeofthesepossibilities.3.D.
Pipes,"TurksinEarlyMuslimService,"documentsthis.4.OntheTurksandCrusaders,seenote 95below,5.Pp.192-93.