An
Explanationof
MilitarySlavery57thenewmilitary
order
acquiredpoliticalandeconomic
powertooandevolvedintoan
aristocracy.
Thus,the
stirrupledtoaseriesof
adjustments
whichcreatedasocialdivisioninwestern
Europe:it
produced
amilitary aristocracyand
chargedthe
peasantrywiththeexpense.
Did the
stirruphave a
comparableeffectin Islamdom?Perhaps
itcausedashift
alonggeographicratherthansociallines.Inmostofthe
heavilypopulated partsoftheEasternHemi-sphere(notably
thoseinNorthAfrica,theMiddleEast,India,and
China),war-horsescouldnotberaised.8Theintroductionofthe
stirrupenhancedthe
powerofthe
peopleslivingwherehorses could be raised--primarilyin
steppelands and in
deserts--andreducedthestrengthof
peopleslivingin
denselyinhabitedareas, especiallycities.
Bymakinghorses moreim-portanttowarfare,the
stirrupredistributed
powerfromciv-
ilizedtobarbarian
peoples.Thenon-horse-breeding
areas
inIslamdom,like the
peasantryin western
Europe,became anearlypassivesourceoffundsforthehorse
aristocracy,inthiscasefromthe
steppesanddeserts.Thecentersofcivilization
cameunderassaultfromhorseLbreeding
barbarians
duringtheroughly
sevencenturieswhen
cavalryreignedsupreme(700-1400
c.E.).Ifone
acceptsthis
reasoning--andI
proposeitherewithoutbeingconvincedofit
myself--thenmilitaryslaveryappears
tobeananswer
bythecivilizedcenterstothe
predationsofthehorsebarbarians.Thecentersadopted
various
strategiestodealwiththehorsemen:allmadeeffortsto
acquirehorsesoftheirown;andtheMuslimsalsomadethe
imaginativeand
successfuleffortto
bringintheriderstoo.Thus,
militaryslaverycanbe
under-stoodasaresponse
totheshiftin
militarybalancecaused
bythestirrup.To
explainmilitaryslaveryinthis
wayalsoneatlyac-countsforits
appearancenot
longafterthe
stirrupappearedonthescene,withoutanyreferencetoIslam.UnliketheclimaticorTurkic
reasons,thisoneanswers
whymilitaryslaverydidnot7.Its
possibleeffectsinsub-SaharanAfricaarediscussed
inJ.Goody,Technol-ogy,Tradition,andtheStateinAfrica(London,1971),pp.34-37.8.Here,asso
often,JapanresemblesWestern
Europe.