84 CHAPTER 3 HOW MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS WORK
How exactly the message substance or affective responses are processed is likely to depend
on consumers’ elaboration likelihood. Therefore, we distinguish six types of marketing
communications models based on two dimensions (see Table 3.2). The first dimension
pertains to elaboration likelihood which can be either high or low. The second dimension is
related to the attitude component on which attitude formation is mainly built, i.e. cognition,
affect or behaviour.
High elaboration likelihood, cognitive attitude formation
The models that will be discussed here are relevant if the consumer’s motivation, ability
and opportunity are high and especially when cognitive elements are important for attitude
formation. An example is someone who is going to buy a home video installation and tries to
compare objectively the different brands available on several attributes (price, sound quality,
etc.) before making a decision.
Multiple attribute models
The most famous multiple attribute model is no doubt the Expectancy–Value model,
or Fishbein model.^35 In this model, brand attitudes are made up of three elements: relevant
product attributes, the extent to which one believes the brand possesses these attributes,
and the evaluation of these attributes or how good/bad one thinks it is for a brand to possess
these attributes. More specifically, brand attitude is represented by the weighted sum of the
products of brand beliefs and attribute evaluations:
Abooiie
i
n
=
=
∑
1
where: Ao = attitude towards object o
boi = belief of object o possessing attribute i
ei = evaluation of attribute i
n = number of relevant attributes
Table 3.2 Six types of attitude formation and change
Elaboration likelihood based on
motivation/involvement, ability and opportunity
High elaboration central-
route processing
Low elaboration peripheral-
route processing
Attitudes
based on:
Cognitions Multi-attribute models
Self-generated persuasion
Heuristic evaluation
Affect Feelings-as-information
model
Ad transfer
Feelings transfer
Classical conditioning
Mere exposure effect
Behaviour Post-experience model
Perception–Experience–
Memory model
Reinforcement model
Routinised response behaviour
M03_PELS3221_05_SE_C03.indd 84 6/5/13 3:03 PM