Elusive Victories_ The American Presidency at War-Oxford University Press (2012)

(Axel Boer) #1
notes to pages 41‒45 375


  1. For a concise discussion of the Prussian General Staff as developed by
    Helmuth von Moltke, see General Rupert Smith, Th e Utility of Force:
    Th e Art of War in the Modern World (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007),
    95–100.

  2. McPherson, Tried by War , 23.

  3. McPherson, Tried by War , 42–43.

  4. McPherson, Tried by War , 171–72.

  5. Although dated and marred by a defi nite anti-Republican bias,
    Hesseltine’s work treats these issues in depth. See William B. Hesseltine,
    Lincoln and the War Governors (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948, 1955),
    chaps. 11–12.

  6. Cohen, Supreme Command.

  7. Andrew J. Polsky, “‘Mr. Lincoln’s Army’ Revisited: Partisanship,
    Institutional Position, and Union Army Command, 1861–1865,” Studies in
    American Political Development 16 (2) (Fall 2002): 176–207.

  8. McPherson, Tried by War , 41–44. See similarly McPherson, Abraham
    Lincoln and the Second American Revolution , 70–71.

  9. Richard Bruce Winders, Mr. Polk’s Army (College Station: Texas A and M
    University Press, 1997), 36, 64–65.

  10. Th omas J. Goss, Th e War within the Union High Command: Politics and
    Generalship during the Civil War (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas,
    2003).

  11. John Y. Simon, “Grant, Lincoln, and Unconditional Surrender,” in
    Lincoln’s Generals , ed. Gabor S. Boritt (New York: Oxford University
    Press, 1995), 171.

  12. Ezra J. Warner, Generals in Blue: Lives of the Union Commanders (Baton
    Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1964, 1996), 234–35.

  13. See Polsky, “‘Mr. Lincoln’s Army’ Revisited,” 189–91. Historians have long
    attributed partisanship to Union offi cers based on very loose standards of
    evidence, resulting in higher estimates of partisanship.

  14. On McClellan’s political ambitions, see Stephen W. Sears, George
    B. McClellan: Th e Young Napoleon (1988; reprint ed., New York: Da Capo
    Press, 1999), chaps. 5–6.

  15. McPherson, Tried by War , 114–15, 137. Buell’s biographer asserts that
    he held strong Democratic beliefs and had owned slaves until the very
    beginning of the war. Stephen D. Engle, Don Carlos Buell: Most Promising
    of All (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999).

  16. Polsky, “‘Mr. Lincoln’s Army’ Revisited,” 193–94.

  17. McPherson, Tried by War , 268–69.

  18. McPherson, Tried by War , 2–3, 69–71; Herman Hattaway and Archer
    Jones, “Lincoln as a Military Strategist,” Civil War History 26 (1980):
    293–303 ; Hattaway, “Lincoln’s Presidential Example in Dealing with the
    Military,” 18–20.

  19. Cohen, Supreme Command , 23–29.

Free download pdf