Elusive Victories_ The American Presidency at War-Oxford University Press (2012)

(Axel Boer) #1

388 notes to pages 122‒127



  1. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 471–72.

  2. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 192–93.

  3. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 461ff.

  4. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 181, 466.

  5. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 479–81.

  6. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 160–61.

  7. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 10ff.

  8. See especially MacMillan, Paris 1919 , Part Th ree.

  9. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , xxx, 54–55, 58–59.

  10. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , chap. 17.

  11. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 22–24, 26–28, 31–32.

  12. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 180–81.

  13. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 160–61.

  14. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 14–15, 287.

  15. Clements, Woodrow Wilson , 172–73. Th is view was fi rst expressed at
    the time by the press, but the warning was also self-serving—reporters
    wanted access to the meetings. See MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 57.

  16. For a discussion of how Wilson misread public opinion in Italy, see
    MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 298–300.

  17. Th e claim was fi rst circulated widely by John Maynard Keynes, who had
    an axe to grind because his recommendation to eschew reparations had
    not been accepted. See MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 478–79.

  18. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 12–13.

  19. See MacMillan’s discussions of the Middle East, the Balkans, and Eastern
    Europe. MacMillan, Paris 1919.

  20. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 9–10.

  21. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 200–1.

  22. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 187–89, 470–71.

  23. Japan secured former German possessions in the Pacifi c as mandates and
    economic concessions in Shantung, China, over the strenuous objections
    of the Chinese delegation. On the other hand, the Japanese did not get
    everything they wanted: their proposed language on racial equality was
    not included in the League of Nations provisions.

  24. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 96–97.

  25. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 475.

  26. Macmillan is more generous to Clemenceau, but concedes that his
    failure to build an alliance undermined all he gained at the conference.
    MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 202–3.

  27. MacMillan, Paris 1919 , 151–52.

  28. MacMillan reports that one journal poll found two-thirds of its readers
    supportive of the League. But such polls could yield misleading results.
    To cite the most notorious later example, the 1936 Literary Digest presi-
    dential poll predicted that Franklin Roosevelt would lose the presidential
    election, which he won by a landslide.

Free download pdf