The Globe and Mail - 09.03.2020

(Ron) #1

A10 O THEGLOBEANDMAIL| MONDAY,MARCH9,


EDITORIAL


PHILLIPCRAWLEY
PUBLISHERANDCEO
DAVIDWALMSLEY
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

F

ederal Finance Minister Bill Morneau did his best to
calmCanadianslastweekwhenhesaidOttawahasthe
“fiscal firepower” to respond to any economic fallout

from the coronavirus crisis.


That was a useful message to deliver. Along with the fact

the Bank of Canada lowered interest rates by 50 points last


week, and that the Trudeau government has created a cabi-


net committee focused on the disease, there are positive


signs that ourgovernment is being pro-active.


But Ottawa needs to do more. While it’s good to know that

the federalgovernment is prepared to stimulate the econo-


my if needed, an even more important message is that it will


do whatever is required, right now, to limit the damage of an


epidemic in the first place.


That means spending money on preparations. Prime Min-

isterJustinTrudeausaidlastweekthatOttawawon’tresortto


“knee-jerk reactions.” Fair enough. But no one is asking any-


onetooverreact.WhatCanadianswantistobereassuredthat


the country isn’t underprepared.


AtthesametimeasMr.Trudeauandhiscabinetareletting

the business world know that the Treasury is locked and


loaded and ready to fire should the economy suffer, Ottawa


should also be asking the provinces, major cities and other


stakeholdersh “How much money do you need to be ready if


the worst happensÌ”


Consider it an insurance policy. Ottawa can spend a few

hundred million dollars on a premium now – the equivalent


of a rounding error on a federal budget of $355-billion – that


could well prevent it from having to spend a lot more later.


The coronavirus is not, at its root, an economic issue. It’s a

public-health issue, which, if not dealt with, will deliver haz-


ardouseconomicsideeffects.Theconcernfortheeconomyis


notmisplaced,buttheeconomywillonlyneedarescuepack-


age if we fail to stop the spread of the disease.


Canadaknowswhatisneededbetterthanothercountries.

The silver lining of having been one of the epicentres of the


2003 SARS epidemic is that Canada got to study where and


why its health system failed.


Out of that tragedy came better preparations for the next,

inevitablepandemic.ThatincludesthecreationofthePublic


Health Agency of Canada, which has 2,400 employees and is


at the forefront of the fight to contain the spread of the coro-


navirus, and better disease-control protocols in hospitals,


better training for health-care workers and better communi-


cations between those on the front lines.


But those advances, which will save lives this time, were

responses to the circumstances of the SARS epidemic. That


crisis was mostly confined to China, caught Toronto un-


aware, spread more slowly and, though it appears to have


beenmoredeadly,inCanadawaslargelyconfinedtotwohos-


pitals.


The coronavirus is different. It is already far more wide-

spread than SARS and has killed more people, but it also ap-


pears to be much less deadly. This is a virus that seems des-


tined to infect many more people than SARS. And we know


it’s already here in Canada.


So while Ottawa has no reason to hit the panic button, it

should let it be known that it has the money to ensure the


country isn’t underprepared for what may be coming.


In the United States, Congress quickly passed a US$8.3-bil-

lion coronavirus funding package that President Donald


Trump signed on Friday. It willhelp local and stategovern-


ments test for the disease and prepare for an epidemic.


The move, with Congress appropriating the money in re-

cord time, sends a more concrete message than Mr. Mor-


neau’s assurances that he will set aside a larger-than-usual


amountforunforeseencontingenciesintheupcomingfeder-


albudget–adocumentwhosedropdateislikelyweeksaway.


Mr. Morneau is signalling a readiness to tackle future eco-

nomic contingencies, but is Canada prepared, right now, for


the health consequences that may be comingÌ


If the number of suspected infections jumps, can enough

people be tested for the virus quicklyÌ Do hospitals currently


have enough staff and protective gearÌ Are there enough


beds and facilities availableÌ At this point, that’s not clear.


The federalgovernment is right to worry about the eco-

nomic fallout of the coronavirus. But the best way to avoid


being hit with high economic costs tomorrow is to have ev-


erything on hand to successfully tackle the disease today.


No one ever regretted being overprepared for a disaster.

Preparingfor


theworstis


forthebest


ONEFORALL

Re Conservative Conundrum
(Letters, March 6)h I believe a let-
ter writer is mistaken in saying
that returning the federal carbon
tax as a per-capita dividend
makes the policy ineffective.
Some people have no low-cost
ways to reduce emissionsÝ they
can’t trade in for a more fuel-effi-
cient vehicle, take transit or cut
marginal trips. Because high-in-
come households spend more on
fossil fuels (being less sensitive to
gas prices) and thus pay a dispro-
portionateshareofthetax,there-
sult of returning that amount
equallyisthatabout70percentof
households come out ahead,
even if they can’t cut emissions at
all. For people who can, their in-
centive is to collect the dividend
and save money by continuing to
reduce their fuel consumption.
This should lower Canada’s total
output.
The question is whether the
Conservatives will accept this, or
continue trying to change the
subject.
RussilWvongVancouver

PEITOQUEBEC

Re The Politics Of Voting In 6ue-
bec(Editorial,March6)hSpeaking
from painful experience after
three failed provincial referen-
dums or plebiscites on electoral
reform, allow me to make a few
suggestions to Frandois Legault.
First, stipulate from the outset
astrongthresholdforacceptance,
and stay away from 50 per cent
plus one.
Second, pick a single model,
such as mixed-member propor-
tional, and make it a simple yes-
or-no proposition.
Third, introduce a multi-
pronged public-education cam-
paignnolessthanoneyearbefore
the referendum.
Fourth, spell out how party-list
candidates will be chosenÝ avoid
the use of suspect committees to
explore both yes and no posi-
tionsÝencouragethemediatoen-
gage in spirited debate.
Fifth, reassure rural communi-
ties that their electoral weight
(and voice) will not be dimin-
ished.
Lastly, and most importanth If
not all mainline parties agree on
the need for reform, it is probably
besttoshelvetheideauntilacon-
sensus is reached.
In the absence of these recom-
mendations,atleastonPrinceEd-
ward Island, the whole process
tends to descend into little more
than a political gong show.
PeterMcKennaProfessorof
politicalscience,UniversityofPrince
EdwardIsland;Charlottetown

ATAXUPONYOU

ReAnAlbertaBudgetStillBetting
On Oil (Editorial, March 5)h The
UCP government astounds me. It

will balance Alberta’s debt with
cutstoeducation,healthcareand
parks while offering tax incen-
tives to large companies. Has it
considered all options to balance
the coffersÌ
Why not propose a sales taxÌ
God forbid we consider this, an
Albertan might shudder. But Ja-
son Kenney would be the first to
takeaswipeatotherpremiers,In-
digenous leaders and the Prime
Minister about their perceived
lack of interest in the well-being
of Albertans. I think he should
standupanddemonstrateleader-
ship in these challenging times.
CatherineMooreCanmore,Alta.

WhenwillAlbertaturnitsfocusto
diversifyingtheprovincialecono-
myÌ It might be politically easier
than bringing in a sales tax.
SusanMorrisonKelowna,B.C.

VIRUSPOLICIES

Re Experts Criticize Ontario Virus
Policy (March 4)h The article re-
fers to mounting evidence that
shows COVID-19 spreads through
droplets. However, the Public
Health Agency of Canada has
statedthat“significantadditional
information is still required { to
fully understand how the disease
is transmitted.” It is precisely be-
cause we do not yet fully under-
standhowthediseaseistransmit-
ted that the United States, Eu-
ropean Union and Britain recom-
mend health-care workers use
airborne precautions when car-
ingforpatientswhomayhaveCO-
VID-19. This means they should
wear, at minimum, a fit-tested
N-95 respirator. This is what Chi-
nesehealth-careworkersarenow
wearing, according to the World
Health Organization.
I believe Ontario and other in-
ternational jurisdictions are cor-
rectly following the precaution-
ary principle. This holds that
whenthereisscientificuncertain-
ty about the transmission and se-
verityofavirus,oneshoulderron
the side of safety. PHAC should
follow Ontario’s lead to avoid
needless risk to workers and the
public.
LindaSilas
President,CanadianFederationof
NursesUnions;Ottawa

NOMORE

Re Ontario Won’t Renew Extra
Funding For Sexual-assault Cen-
tres, Advocates Say (March 5)h
The failure of Ontario to renew
extra funding for sexual-assault
centres seems nothing more and
nothinglessthantherevictimiza-
tion of the vulnerable. I find it be-
yond tragic thatthe government
has no appreciation for the life-
time of pain mostly women will
endure.
Togofromvictimtosurvivoris
difficult enough without cutting
off a potential lifeline.
MarvinZukerToronto

HIGHTIME

Re Ontario Providing $20-million
Boost For Psychotherapy Access
(March2)andAsCannabisStocks
Cool, Will Psychedelic Drugs Be
The Next Market FrenzyÌ (Report
onBusiness,March3)hThereisre-
search from the United States,
Canada, Israel and beyond that
suggestsastrongrecoveryratefor
PTSD sufferers when psychother-
apy is combined with the guided
use of the psychoactive material
MDMA.
Psilocybinisalsobeingstudied
thus. I find it too bad the Ontario
government could not offer a
combination of psychotherapy
with MDMA or psilocybin for
more positive effects.
Wellknowninpsychedelicsup-
port circles is that one
well-guided trip with MDMA or
psilocybin may affect inner heal-
ing that psychotherapy alone
does not. For me, one guided trip
withlegalayahuascabroughtpro-
found inner healing unaddressed
in 15 years of psychotherapy.
Our laws, which criminalize
these psychoactive substances,
should be changed to make such
deeper entheogenic healing legal
and possible.
KatherineKimbell
Foundingmember,Ottawa
PsychedelicEducationNetwork

THISISHOWWEDOIT

Re The CRA Should Do Our Taxes
For Us (Report on Business,
March 6)h We would need to have
alotoftrusttoletthegovernment
do our taxes, and columnist Rita
Trichur has reason to complain
about the complexity of the or-
deal.
A few changes this year further
complicate the procedureh Pro-
vincial tax papers are no longer
pink, so one is forced to shuffle
through all the forms to find in-
formation. Also, line 150, which
used to be total income, is now
line 15000. Isthe government
planning to complicate this proc-
ess by a factor of 100Ì
I am a senior, and every year I
sit down with pencil and calcula-
tor to work on my husband’s and
my taxes. I refuse to buy a pro-
gram or online service because it
shouldn’t be necessary to pay to
do taxes. It should be much sim-
pler.
Mymainreasonfordoingtaxes
the old-fashioned way is to know
howthesystemworks.Thereisno
waytotrulyfindoutotherthanto
sit down with that pencil and cal-
culator, and search through all
those darned forms.
LeslieMartelMississauga

LETTERSTOTHEEDITOR


Thesubjectwhoistrulyloyaltothechiefmagistratewillneitheradvisenorsubmittoarbitrarymeasures-Junius


LetterstotheEditorshouldbe
exclusivetoTheGlobeandMail.
Includename,addressanddaytime
phonenumber.Keeplettersunder
150words.Lettersmaybeeditedfor
lengthandclarity.E-mail:
[email protected]

SINCLAIRSTEWART
DEPUTYEDITOR


CHRISTINEBROUSSEAU
ASSISTANTMANAGINGEDITOR,NEWS


ANGELAPACIENZA
EXECUTIVEEDITOR
SHAWNARICHER
ASSISTANTMANAGINGEDITOR,
FEATURESANDSPORTS

GARYSALEWICZ
EDITOR,REPORTONBUSINESS
DENNISCHOQUETTE
MANAGINGEDITOR,ROBANDINVESTIGATIONS

TONYKELLER
EDITORIALPAGEEDITOR
NATASHAHASSAN
OPINIONEDITOR

MATTFREHNER
HEADOFVISUALS
SYLVIASTEAD
PUBLICEDITOR
Free download pdf