The Globe and Mail - 09.03.2020

(Ron) #1
MONDAY,MARCH9,2020 | THEGLOBEANDMAIL O NEWS | A 9

monitored daily for respiratory
illness,personalprotectiveequip-
ment is used for all interactions
and communal gatherings have
been halted. Meals are delivered
toresidentsontraysinlieuofpeo-
ple dining together in a common
area.
Christine Sorensen, president
of the BC Nurses’ Union, said a
shortageofnursesintheprovince
means many are working at mul-
tiple sites, which could lead to ex-
haustion and further health risks.
“InthissituationatLynnValley
care home, those nurses will be
working long hours,” she said.
“There has to be extra time allot-
tedforhandwashingandandcar-
ing for patients who will be in the
facility and that additional time
needstobeaccountedforbecause
it needs extra staffing.”
A B.C. woman who was on the
GrandPrincesscruiseinFebruary,
andwhohadlingeringcoldsymp-
toms, got word Sunday that she
had tested negative.
Thewomanwentintoisolation

after undergoing testing. Howev-
er, for 12 days before hearing
about the cluster of cases, she in-
teracted with family members
and went to work, contact that
she had worried may have placed
others at risk. The Globe and Mail
is keeping her name confidential
because she is worried about the
stigma of being connected to the
virus.
Amidreportsaboutpanic-buy-
ing at grocery stores for food and
other staples, including toilet pa-
per, Dr. Hinshaw said people
should consider their neighbours
who may be quarantined.
“Rather than cleaning the
stores out of toilet paper, proba-
bly what would be helpful is talk-
ingtoneighbours,andfamilyand
friendsaboutanyoneinthatcom-
munity circle needing to stay
home for two weeks, who could
helpsupportthembygettingsup-
plies,” she said.

WithreportsfromCheriseSeucharan
andJillMahoney

ada


peciallyinthetourismandhospi-
tality industries. On Sunday, Al-
italia, which is in administration


  • a process similar to filing for
    bankruptcy – announced that it
    was stopping flights from Milan’s
    Malpensa airport. It is also oper-
    ating a reduced number of na-
    tional flights from Milan’s Linate
    airport.


Amanwearingaprotectivemask
passesbytheColiseuminRome
onSaturday.BySunday,Italyhad
reported7,375COVID-19cases
and366fatalities.
ALBERTOPIZZOLI
/AFPVIAGETTYIMAGES

O

n Saturday, Bonnie Henry, British Co-
lumbia’s Provincial Health Officer,
convened the media to announce
that there was an outbreak of coro-
navirus at a long-term care facility in Vancouv-
er.
At one point in a seemingly routine press
conference, she was verklempt, overcome by
emotion.
Dr. Henry, a veteran of countless public-
health battles, domestically and international-
ly, is tough as nails.
Butheremotionalresponsetonewsthattwo
seniors at Lynn Valley Care Centre have been
infectedbycoronavirusisareminderthatwhat
we’re witnessing here is a nightmare scenario –
a novel respiratory virus infiltrating a facility
that is home to more than 200 seniors, many of
them frail and suffering from
chronic illnesses that place them
at high risk.
Worse yet, one of the health-
care workers at the facility is in-
fected and may have carried the
bug into the home. It’s unclear
how the worker contracted CO-
VID-19 because she has no travel
history, making her Canada’s
first-known case of community
transmission of coronavirus.
“This is one of the scenarios that we have
been, of course, most concerned about,” Dr.
Henry said diplomatically.
If we want a sense of how bad this can get,
and quickly, we need only cast our eyes a bit
south of B.C. to the horror story unfolding at
the Life Care Center in Kirkland, Wash.
The 120-bed facility in suburban Seattle has,
todate,recorded16COVID-19deaths.Dozensof
other residents are ill in hospital.
If that was not bad enough, 70 of the 180
workers employed in the care home have test-
ed positive.
What’s unfolding in Washington State
shouldsendashiverofdreaddownthespineof
anyone with a loved one in care – and there are
more than 350,000 people living in nursing
homes, chronic care and long-term care facil-
ities in Canada, and another 2.5 million in the
UnitedStates.Almostallofthemareolderthan
70 and in this pandemic-in-all-but-name, age
matters.Amongpeopleolderthan80whohave
contractedcoronavirus,thedeathrateisastag-
gering 22 per cent. In those older than 70, it’s 8
per cent.

Protecting seniors, especially those in insti-
tutional care, from infection and death is an
enormous challenge. So too is protecting staff,
who work tirelessly and intimately with their
charges.
But it has to be a priority of our response.
At the Lynn Valley Care Centre, they have in-
voked the outbreak protocol. That means daily
monitoring of residents for symptoms, staff in
protective equipment, a ban on public gather-
ings including communal meals, severe restric-
tions on visitors and cleaning like lives depend
on it (which they do).
Nursing homes and other care facilities have
afairbitofpracticewiththesemeasures.Acase
of the flu can rip through a home in no time,
leaving carnage in its wake.
What we don’t know is how much more
problematic COVID-19 might be. We do know
there is no vaccine (there is for the flu). Coro-
navirus also seems to spread more readily,
especially since it lives a lot longer on surfaces
than many other viruses.
But all the wonderful protocols on paper
cannot mask some of the persist-
ent challenges in care facilities,
chief among them residents’
great vulnerability to infection
because of their underlying
health conditions, and their in-
tensedependenceonstaffsuchas
personal support workers, who
can be vectors for transmission.
Complicating the response is
that many workers juggle shifts
between various facilities and
their pay and benefits are so abysmal that they
are reluctant to take time off if they are sick.
The Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions
has warned that nurses (and other health
workers)needmuchbetteraccesstoprotective
equipment. The experience at Washington’s
Life Care Center, where 40 per cent of staff end-
ed up infected, underlines how this is essential.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Pre-
ventionhasrecommendedthateveryoneolder
than 60 “should stay at home as much as pos-
sible”tolimitthespreadofcoronavirus,aneye-
popping recommendation that has received
very little media attention.
Let’s hope that Canadian public-health offi-
cials continue to outshine their U.S. counter-
parts with thoughtful, evidence-based recom-
mendations and actions.
While we watch the situation at the Van-
couver care facility with trepidation, red flags
have to go up elsewhere, focusing on keeping
vulnerablesenior-seniors–those75andolder–
and their care providers as safe as possible, es-
pecially those in facilities that can easily be-
come incubators for epidemics.

Senior-carefacilitiesareespecially


vulnerabletoCOVID-19outbreaks


ANDRÉ
PICARD

OPINION

Amongpeopleolder
than80whohave
contracted
coronavirus,the
deathrateisa
staggering
22percent.

F

rom the restriction of fundamental lib-
erties to the rationing of scarce medical
resources, the spread of COVID-19 is ex-
pected to raise extraordinary ethical di-
lemmas for leadersin government and the
health-care system.
Experts say Canada will likely consider re-
strictions on movement and large gatherings,
as in China and Italy, to slow the progress of
the disease. Such measures have rarely been
considered in this country.
Canada may also have to consider how to
allocate scarce medical resources, such as ven-
tilators and intensive-care beds. How will it en-
sure that health-care workers, among the har-
dest hit in these outbreaks, can stay on the
job?
Here are some of the key ethical categories
identified by the pandemic influenza working
group of the University of Toronto Joint Centre
for Bioethics.

HEALTH CARE WORKERS
As COVID-19 spreads in Canada, doctors and
nurses may worry about the risk to themselves
and their families. In the SARS outbreak, 43
per cent of patients in Canada were health-
care workers. Afterward, a report concluded
the government failed to protect medical pro-
fessionals.
“We want to be able to protect them, both
because they’ve done a service treating the
public, but also because if we protect them
they’re able to continue treating patients,” said
Lorian Hardcastle, a professor in the faculties
of law and medicine at the University of Cal-
gary.
It’s critical that health-care workers stay on
the job and trust that they’re being looked af-
ter, Prof. Hardcastle said.
“The current ethical guidelines are not over-
ly helpful. ...They don’t provide a lot of con-
crete guidance about when health-care work-
ers can ethically refuse to work versus when
they have an ethical duty to treat patients,”
Prof. Hardcastle said.
Most doctors and nurses, though, accept the
risks in their work and are trained to protect
themselves.
“Most of us who went into the health-care
system did so because we score high on want-
ing to help others,” said John Conley, an epide-
miologist and professor of medicine at the
University of Calgary.
“There will be stresses on the system, but I
think the health-care profession will pull
through.”
Sally Bean, director of ethics and policy at
Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto, said hospi-
tals are discussing how to assign staff. They
may decide that those who are pregnant, for
example, or elderly, or have underlying health
conditions, should be deployed elsewhere.

“The key thing is providing personal protec-
tive equipment or environmental settings so
that we minimize the risk of potential harm to
our health care providers,” Ms. Bean said.

RESTRICTING LIBERTY
It appears that social distancing and restric-
tion of movement have proved effective in
some countries at slowing the spread of CO-
VID-19. Canada has not yet instituted such po-
lices, but it may be only a matter of time.
Prof. Hardcastle says it’s a delicate balanc-
ing act for governments.
“Whenever thegovernment restricts rights,
we expect them to do so in a way that’s evi-
dence-based and justifiable and transparent,”
she said.
“It’s partly a public a public support and
public trust issue. If the public perceives what
the government’s doing to be evidence-based
and necessary and rational, then they’re more
likely to comply,” she said.
Quarantine often sounds reasonable so long
as the person in quarantine is not you, Prof.
Hardcastle added. It can also create real hard-
ship for those who are disabled or don’t have
the support of friends or family in the commu-
nity to help provide food and medicine.
Maintaining the willing support of the pub-
lic is crucial becausethe government doesn’t
have the capacity to compel compliance.

RATIONING MEDICAL CARE
An influx of coronavirus patients could forcea
strained health system to confront difficult
questions. Should coronavirus patients take
precedence over those with other conditions?
Should the elderly or those with underlying
conditions take precedence over younger and
healthier patients? In the event of a shortage,
who gets a ventilator?
“I think these conversations are starting to
happen in the abstract but I don’t think
they’re far enough along and I don’t think
they’re concrete enough,” Prof. Hardcastle
said.
“We don’t want to be making these deci-
sions on the fly. ...Those questions need to be
dealt with now, because that’s not an appro-
priate kind of pressure to put on health-care
professionals.”
Ms. Bean said Ontario is developing guide-
lines for allocating resources based on a frame-
work devised for the drug supply shortages of


  1. The guidelines have three parts: describ-
    ing the allocation criteria, identifying the val-
    ues that guide decision making and outlining
    the processes that guarantee fairness.
    “I think [the spread of COVID-19] poses re-
    ally acute ethical considerations because
    they’re urgent. We don’t know what this is or
    what the scope will look like when it when it
    arrives. That unknown dimension brings the
    ethical considerations into sharp focus,” Prof.
    Hardcastle said.


Somekeyethicalquestionsthatarebeing


raisedbythespreadofthecoronavirus


JOEFRIESEN

sscruiseship,operatedbyPrincessCruises,asitmaintainsaholdingpattern
cisco,Calif.,onSunday.JOSHEDELSON/AFPVIAGETTYIMAGES
Free download pdf