184 Understanding Rational Decision Making
25 Hvistendahl, J. K., & Kahl, M. R. (1975). Roman v. sans serif body type: Readability and reader preference.
News Research Bulletin , 2 , 3–11.
Robinson, D. O., Abbamonte, M., & Evans, S. H. (1971). Why serifs are important: The perception of
small print. Visible Language , 4 , 353–359.
See n8, Wheildon (1995).
26 Arditi, A., & Cho, J. (2005). Serifs and font legibility. Vision Research , 45 (23), 2926–2933.
Gould, J. D., Alfaro, L., Finn, R., Haupt, B., & Minuto, A. (1987). Reading from CRT displays can be as
fast as reading from paper. Human Factors , 29 (5), 497–517.
See n24.
27 Schriver et al. as described in Schriver, K. A. (1997, pp. 288–303). Dynamics in document design: Creating
text for readers. New York: Wiley.
28 Juni, S., & Gross, J. S. (2008). Emotional and persuasive perception of fonts. Perceptual and Motor Skills ,
106 (1), 35–42.
29 Sanocki, T. (1987). Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: Font-specific, schematic tuning. Jour-
nal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 13 (2), 267–278.
Gauthier, I., Wong, A. C., Hayward, W. G., & Cheung, O. S. (2006). Font tuning associated with expertise
in letter perception. Perception, 35 (4), 541–559.
Walker, P. (2008). Font tuning: A review and new experimental evidence. Visual Cognition , 16 (8), 1022–
1058.
30 Sanocki, T., & Dyson, M. C. (2012). Letter processing and font information during reading: Beyond
distinctiveness, where vision meets design. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics , 74 (1), 132–145.
31 See n24, Tinker (1963).
32 See n12, Tinker (1965).
33 Paterson, D. G., & Tinker, M. A. (1942). Influence of line width on eye movements for six-point type. Jour-
nal of Educational Psychology , 33 (7), 552–555.
34 Dyson, M. C. (2004). How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour & Information Tech-
nology , 23 (6), 377–393.
Dyson, M. C., & Haselgrove, M. (2001). The influence of reading speed and line length on the effective-
ness of reading from screen. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , 54 (4), 585–612.
35 Becker, D., Heinrich, J., van Sichowsky, R., & Wendt, D. (1970). Reader preferences for typeface and
leading. Journal of Typographic Research , 1 , 61–66.
36 See n24, Tinker (1963).
Mackey, M. A., & Metz, M. (2009). Ease of reading of mandatory information on Canadian food product
labels. International Journal of Consumer Studies , 33 (4), 369–381.
37 Smith, J. M., & McCombs, E. (1971). The graphics of prose. Visible Language , 4 (Autumn), 365–369.
38 Pinelli, T. E., Glassman, M., & Cordle, V. M. (1982). Survey of reader preferences concerning the format of
NASA technical reports (NASA TM-No 84502). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
39 Trollip, S. R., & Sales, G. (1986). Readability of computer-generated fill-justified text. Human Factors ,
28 (2), 159–163.
40 Gregory, M., & Poulton, E. C. (1970). Even versus uneven right-hand margins and the rate of compre-
hension in reading. Ergonomics , 13 (4), 427–434.
Hartley, J., & Mills, R. (1973). Unjustified experiments in typographical research and instructional design.
British Journal of Educational Technology , 4 , 120–131.
41 Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word
recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology , 42 (4), 317–367.
Redish, J. C. (1980). Readability. In D. Felker (Ed.), Document design: A review of the relevant research
(pp. 69–93). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., & Cortese, C. (1979). Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word
repetition effects across task and modality. Memory & Cognition , 7 (1), 3–12.
42 Gibson, E. J., Bishop, C., Schiff, W., & Smith, J. (1964). Comparison of meaningfulness and pronounce-
ability as grouping principles in the perception and retention of verbal material. Journal of Experimental
Psychology , 67 (2), 173–182.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Jour-
nal of Experimental Psychology , 81 (2), 275–280.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology , 1 , 59–85.