Heuristics and Biases in Audience Decision Making 24568 Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of Another’s Knowing: Prosody and filled pauses
as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language , 34 (3),
383–398.
69 McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather flock conjointly? Rhyme as reason in apho-
risms. Psychological Science , 11 (5), 424–428.
70 See n46, Reber et al. (2004).
71 O’Sullivan, C. S., Chen, A., Mohapatra, S., Sigelman, L., & Lewis, E. (1988). Voting in ignorance: The
politics of smooth-sounding names. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 18 (13), 1094–1106.
Smith, G. W. (1998b). The political impact of name sounds. Communication Monographs , 65 (2), 154–172.
72 Laham, S. M., Koval, P., & Alter, A. L. (2012). The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith
more than Mr. Colquhoun. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 48 (3), 752–756.
73 Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing
fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 103 (24), 9369–9372.
74 Fang, X., Singh, S., & Ahluwalia, R. (2007). An examination of different explanations for the mere expo-
sure effect. Journal of Consumer Research , 34 (1), 97–103.
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Recognising what you like: Examining the relation between the
mere-exposure effect and recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology , 19 (1), 103–118.
Szpunar, K. K., Schellenberg, E. G., & Pliner, P. (2004). Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a func-
tion of exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 30 (2), 370–381.
75 Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 9 (2,
Pt.2), 1–27.
76 Albarracín, D., & Vargas, P. (2010). Attitudes and persuasion: From biology to social responses to persua-
sive intent. In D. Albarracin & P. Vargas (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology ( 5 th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 394–427).
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from
psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 27 (7),
889–898.
Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and
diffuse effects. Psychological Science , 11 (6), 462–466.
77 Nunes, J. C., Ordanini, A., & Valsesia, F. (2015). The power of repetition: Repetitive lyrics in a song
increase processing fluency and drive market success. Journal of Consumer Psychology , 25 (2), 187–199.
78 Coulter, K. S., & Roggeveen, A. L. (2014). Price number relationships and deal processing fluency: The
effects of approximation sequences and number multiples. Journal of Marketing Research , 51 (1), 69–82.
79 Weber, E. U., Siebenmorgen, N., & Weber, M. (2005). Communicating asset risk: How name recognition
and the format of historic volatility information affect risk perception and investment decisions. Risk
Analysis , 25 (3), 597–609.
80 Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1983).
Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public
Opinion Quarterly , 47 (1), 16–35.
Leff, D. R., Protess, D. L., & Brooks, S. C. (1986). Crusading journalism: Changing public attitudes and
policy-making agendas. Public Opinion Quarterly , 50 (3), 300–315.
81 Weisbuch, M., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2003). Prior source exposure and persuasion: Fur-
ther evidence for misattributional processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 29 (6), 691–700.
82 Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. M. (1989b). Becoming famous without being recognized:
Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General , 118 (2), 115–125.
83 Hastie, R., Landsman, R., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Eyewitness testimony: The dangers of guessing. Jurimetrics
Journal , 19 , 1–8.
84 Holland, R. W., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). From repetition to conviction: Attitude
accessibility as a determinant of attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 39 (6), 594–601.
85 Brickman, P., Redfield, J., Harrison, A. A., & Crandall, R. (1972). Drive and predisposition as factors in
the attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 8 (1), 31–44.
86 Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and
persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 10 (1), 3–12.
87 Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against
illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 144 (5), 993–1002.
88 Allport, F. H., & Lepkin, M. (1945). Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: Why some people
believe them. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 40 (1), 3–36.