Ancient Literacies

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

6


Situating Literacy at Rome


Thomas Habinek


In 1997 Emmanuelle Valette-Cagnac published her Paris dissertation on


the anthropology of reading in the Roman world.^1 This important study


opened the way to a new understanding of what its author calls ‘‘the


practices and rituals’’ of reading in relationship to those of speaking and


writing. Valette-Cagnac reminds us of the privileging of the oral over the


written in Roman law, of the range of ways in which a text can be enunci-


ated, as characterized by such Latin verbs asrecito,pronuntio,andcanto,


and of the interdependence of speaking, writing, reading, and performing


in the production of verbal utterances in the Roman world.
2
Like William


Johnson, in his article ‘‘Towards a Sociology of Reading in Classical


Antiquity,’’ published in 2000, Valette-Cagnac shifts attention from text


to practice, from writing to reading, and from a schematic distinction be-


tweenoralityandliteracytoamorenuancedaccountofthevarietiesofboth.
3


A year after Valette-Cagnac’s work appeared, Rudolf Wachter pub-


lished an equally important study of the relationship between Pompeiian


epigraphical verses and the surviving elegiac poetry of Propertius, Tibul-
lus, and Ovid, making the surprising but compelling argument that both


sets of texts could be understood as building on a tradition of orally


transmitted verse in elegiac couplet.^4 Wachter’s paper, the title of which


can be translated as ‘‘Oral Poetry in an Unexpected Context,’’ does not


argue for or against the importance of writing in the production of so-


called literary elegiac, but it does remind us of the role of hearing and



  1. Valette Cagnac 1997.

  2. On the last mentioned point, see also Habinek 2005a.

  3. W. A. Johnson 2000. On reading, rather than writing, as the skill effecting the
    cognitive and social changes that accompany the spread of literacy, see Olson 1994. Morrison
    1987 makes the important distinction between alphabetic literacy, which he associates with
    classical Greece, and textual literacy, which he regards as the contribution of late antiquity
    and the early Middle Ages. He makes no mention, however, of the conflicted efforts of the
    Romans in the direction of textual literacy.

  4. Wachter 1998.


114

Free download pdf