CITY OFGOD(BOOKXII) 291
BOOKXII
CHAPTER 1
In the previous book we saw something of the beginning of the two cities, so far as
angels are concerned. In the same way, we must now proceed to the creation of men and
see the beginning of the cities so far as it concerns the kind of rational creatures who are
mortal. First, however, a few remarks about the angels must be made in order to make it
as clear as I can how there is no real difficulty or impropriety in speaking of a single soci-
ety composed of both men and angels; and why, therefore, it is right to say that there are
not four cities or societies, namely, two of angels and two of men, but only two, one of
them made up of the good—both angels and men—and the other of those who are evil.
There is no reason to doubt that the contrary dispositions which have developed
among these good and bad angels are due, not to different natures and origins, for God
the Author and Creator of all substances has created them both, but to the dissimilar
choices and desires of these angels themselves. Some, remaining faithful to God, the
common good of all, have lived in the enjoyment of His eternity, truth, and love, while
others, preferring the enjoyment of their own power, as though they were their own
good, departed from the higher good and common blessedness for all and turned to
goods of their own choosing.
Preferring the pomp of pride to this sublimity of eternity, the craftiness of vanity
to the certainty of truth, and the turmoil of dissension to the union of love, they became
proud, deceitful, and envious.
Since the happiness of all angels consists in union with God, it follows that their
unhappiness must be found in the very contrary, that is, in not adhering to God. To the ques-
tion: “Why are the good angels happy?” the right answer is: “Because they adhere to God.”
To the question: “Why are the others unhappy?” the answer is: “Because they do not adhere
to God.” In fact, there is no other good which can make any rational or intellectual creature
happy except God. Not every creature has the potentialities for happiness. Beasts, trees,
stones, and such things neither acquire nor have the capacity for this gift. However, every
creature which has this capacity receives it, not from itself, since it has been created out of
nothing, but from its Creator. To possess Him is to be happy; to lose Him is to be in misery.
And, of course, that One whose beatitude depends upon Himself as His own good and not
on any other good can never be unhappy since He can never lose Himself.
Thus, there can be no unchangeable good except our one, true, and blessed God.
All things which He has made are good because made by Him, but they are subject to
change because they were made, not out of Him, but out of nothing. Although they are
not supremely good, since God is a greater good than they, these mutable things are,
none the less, highly good by reason of their capacity for union with and, therefore,
beatitude in the Immutable Good which is so completely their good that, without this
good, misery is inevitable.
But it does not follow that other creatures in the universe are better off merely
because they are incapable of misery. That would be like saying that other members of the
body are better than the eyes because they can never become blind. A sentient nature even
in pain is better than a stone that cannot suffer. In the same way, a rational nature even in
misery is higher than one which, because it lacks reason or sensation, cannot suffer misery.
This being the case, it is nothing less than a perversion of the nature of the angels
if they do not adhere to God. For, remember, their nature is so high in the order of