1068 SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND EROSION
Shen,^15 Karaki,^15 Graf,^16 Brown,^1 Simons, and Senturk and
the ASCE Sedimentation Engineering Manual.
In some instances^15 turbulence flumes (a concrete lined
reach with baffles to create severe turbulence) have been con-
structed across a stream channel in order to suspend the bed
load and thus to sample it by suspended load techniques.
THE MECHANICS OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
IN A STREAM
General
The nature of sediment transport in a stream depends on the
shear intensity of the flow and the type of bed material. The
diagram in Figure 5 shows the sequence of bed forms (waves)
associated with increasing levels of shear on a fine granular
bed material.^3 This figure also shows, schematically, the typi-
cal changes in the Darcy friction factor and the sediment con-
centration with increasing flow velocity. The primary mode
of transport of particles, in the case of ripples,^17 is discrete
steps along the bed; however with increasing shear more of
the bed material becomes suspended until the particle motion
is nearly continuous for anti-dunes.
Dunes and ripples are triangular in shape with relative
flat upstream slopes and sleep downstream slopes. The
water surface waves are out of phase with the dune forma-
tion while ripple formations appear to be independent of the
free surface.
Dune wave lengths, d , are related to the depth of flow
and in general,
l d 3 feet (2)
whereas ripple wave lengths r are shorter,
2" lr 18" (3)
Dune heights, H d , are related to the depth of flow, with the
limiting height approaching the average flow depth. The
ratio of dune length to height is given by^17
815
l
Hd
. (4)
The maximum ripple height is about 0.1 feet.
Both ripples and dunes progress downstream. The tran-
sition from dunes to anti-dunes occurs at a Froude number
close to 1.0.
Anti-dunes, as indicated by Figure 5, are in phase with
the surface wave. The may be stationary or move upstream.
The maximum height of an anti-dune is approximately equal
to the flow depth at the trough of the surface wave.
Simons, 17,18 on the basis of experimental data, developed
the relationship shown in Figure 6 between stream power and
bedform for varying fall diameters. Simons and Richardson^19
also studied the variation of Chézy’s C with bed form. Their
results are summarized in Table 2.
0 123456
V feet/sec.
Friction
Factor
f
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
Concentration of
Bed Material
C ppm.
Flat
Bed
Ripples Dunes Transition Antidunes
C
f
FIGURE 5 The behavior of a mobile stream bed (adapted from Leopold, Wolman, and Miller).
C019_001_r03.indd 1068C019_001_r03.indd 1068 11/18/2005 11:06:00 AM11/18/2005 11:06:00 AM