11.6 Competing Reactions 513
PROBLEMS
Section 11.5: A Simple Reaction Mechanism: Two
Consecutive Steps
11.32For the consecutive first-order reaction without reverse
reactions, assume thatk 1 0 .01000 s−^1 and
k 2 0 .1000 s−^1 .If[A] 0 0 .100 mo L−^1 , find the value
of each concentration att 10 .00 s and att 100 .0s.
11.33 a.For the consecutive first-order reactions without
reverse reactions, make a graph of [A], [B], and [F] in
the case thatk 1 0 .0100 s−^1 andk 2 0 .100 s−^1.
Assume that[A] 0 1 .00 mol L−^1 and that B and F
are initially absent.
b.For the values of part a, make a graph ofd[A]/dt,
d[B]/dt, andd[F]/dt.
11.34a. For the consecutive first-order reactions without
reverse reactions A−→B−→F, obtain the expression
for [B] in the case thatk 1 k 2 , assuming that no B or
F is present at the beginning of the reaction. Proceed
by taking the limit of the expression of Eq. (11.5-6) as
k 1 −→k 2 , using l’Hôpital’s rule.^6
b.Construct a graph showing [A], [B], and [F] as
functions of time for the case that
k 1 k 2 0 .100 s−^1 and[A] 0 1 .00 mol L−^1.
c.Draw a graph showing [A], [B], and [F] as functions of
time for the case thatk 1 0 .099 s−^1 and
k 2 0 .101 s−^1 and[A] 0 1 .00 mol L−^1. Compare it
with your graph from part b.
11.35For the case of two consecutive reactions in which the
reverse reaction of the first reaction cannot be neglected,
sketch a rough graph showing the three concentrations as
functions of time. Compare your graph with those in
Figure 11.6.
11.6 Competing Reactions
In many syntheses a side reaction consumes part of the reactants but gives undesired
products. We consider the simplest case: that two competing reactions are first order
with negligible reverse reaction.
A
k 1
−→F (11.6-1a)
A
k 2
−→G (11.6-1b)
The rates of the two reactions combine to give
−
d[A]
dt
(k 1 +k 2 )[A] (11.6-2)
This equation is the same as Eq. (11.2-2) except thatkfis replaced byk 1 +k 2 , and its
solution is
[A]t[A] 0 e−(k^1 +k^2 )t (11.6-3)
The half-life for the disappearance of A is
t 1 / 2
ln(2)
k 1 +k 2
(11.6-4)
(^6) See Robert G. Mortimer,Mathematics for Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed., Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2005, p. 113ff, or any calculus textbook.