Kant: A Biography

506 Notes to Pages 400—409

66. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 471 (Ak 6, p. 329).


67. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 458 (Ak 6, pp. 3i4f).


68. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 489 (Ak 6, p. 352).


69. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 490 (Ak 6, p. 353).


70. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 567 (Ak 6, p. 447).


71. Kant, Practical Philosophy, pp. 524f. (Ak 6, p. 394).


72. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 599 (Ak 6, p. 487).


73. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 602 (Ak 6, p. 491).


74. Epictetus, The Handbook, ed. Nicholas P. White (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing
    Company, 1983), p. 11.


75. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, pp. 297-309 (Ak 7, pp. 78-94). For Part II
    of The Dispute of the Faculties, see Brandt, "Zum 'Streit der Fakultäten,'" p. 65.


76. Epstein, The Origin of German Conservatism, p. 388.


77. Epstein, The Origin of German Conservatism, p. 391.


78. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, p. 243 (Ak7, p. 10).


79. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, p. 239 (Ak 7, p. 5).


80. For the contents of the essay, see Chapter 7 of this volume.


81. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, p. 301 (Ak 7, p. 84).


82. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, p. 302 (Ak 7, p. 85).


83. Compare Brandt, "Zum 'Streit der Fakultäten,'" pp. 45f. Brandt argues on the
    basis of an early draft by Kant that the targets of the essay are pseudo-Kantians,
    but it is more likely that the parties named in the essay, namely "our politicians"
    and the "ecclesiastics," really are the targets. The censors in Berlin must have seen
    it that way, as well. This does not mean that he might not also have had some of
    his followers in mind (secondarily).


84. See pp. 153-154 of this volume.


85. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, p. 314 (Ak 7, p. 99).


86. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, p. 316 (Ak 7, p. 101).


87. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, p. 318 (Ak 7, pp. iO3f.).


88. See pp. 150-152, this volume.


89. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 44 (Ak 4, p. 389).


90. Kant, Practical Philosophy, p. 44 (Ak 4, p. 388).


91. Ak7,p. 333.


92. Ak7, p. 119.


93. Ak 7, p. 120.


94. Schleiermacher found that an "extract of the particulars could almost be nothing
    else than a collection of trivialities." See Friedrich Schleiermacher, Kritische Gesam¬
    tausgabe, I/2 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984), pp. 365-369, 365


95. Wasianski, Kant, p. 283.


96. The manuscript is published in volumes 21 and 22 of the Academy edition of
    Kant's works, edited by Arthur Buchenau and Gerhard Lehmann. These volumes
    contain most of these notes. But the editors failed to include all of the relevant
    fragments. On the other hand, they included some material that is irrelevant to
    Kant's last work. There is an English translation of this work in the Cambridge
    edition of Kant's works, which in some ways is a better one than that to be found
    in the Academy edition. See Immanuel Kant, Opus postumum, edited, with an in-