XXX INTRODUCTION
"
the loveforandpracticeof noble
and beautiful
architecture
seems
to
havediedout of Indiaprevious
tothe
advent of the
English."
1
Officialexpertssaidhewasa
figmentofmy
imagina-
tion. Andsoheremained
officially,untillast
yearthe
Report
of special investigations into
theconditionsof
modern
Indian
architecture, undertakenatmy
suggestionbefore
the question
ofthebuildingofthenewDelhi
cameintothearena,
waspub-
lished. Theinquiry,thoughadmittedly
onlyavery
superficial
one, hadproved that,sofarfrom
exaggeratingthefacts,
I had
understated thecapacityofthemodern
Indian
master-builder
;
forbesides a quantityof fine building
workin many
different
parts of thenorth of India, theReport revealed
the fact
that,
underfavourableconditions, Indian
master-builderscan
build
aswellas, and betterthan,theirforefathers
didin the daysof
Shah
Jahan.
For in the verydistrict which
was Sir Lepel
Griffin's fieldofobservation,amosque
largerthan thefamous
Jimi'
Masjid of Delhi, and, sofar as it is
completed, afiner
work of art, is now in progress, designed
and carried out
entirelybyIndian craftsmen.
Departmentalism, more suo,
of
course
will belittle the
importanceofthe revelation,
as itdid in thecaseof thehand-
weavingindustry;but
theliving Indianmaster-builderisnow
ontheofficial file, thoughonlyas a
"controversial subject"—
for
departmentalism is still incompetent
to
weigh artistic
evidence, howeverconvincingitmay beto thosewho are able
todoso.
Just
as anAct of Parliament, however bad it maybe, is
lawtoall goodcitizens untilitis amendedor repealed,
so
the
Indian Public Works system of building, based only upon
inefficiency, ruinous to Indian craftsmanship and
otherwise
economicallyvicious—equallybadin artand science
—will be
defendedby
officials,
asgoodofficials, until theorder
is
given
^
Prefaceto
"
FamousMonumentsofCentral
India."