Court Poetry in Late Medieval England and Scotland

(backadmin) #1

  1. J. R. Lander,“Bonds, Coercion and Fear: Henry VII and the Peerage,”Crown
    and Nobility, 1450 – 1509 (London, 1976 ), 267 – 300 ( 282 ).

  2. B. P. Wolffe,The Crown Lands, 1461 to 1536 : An Aspect of Yorkist and Early
    Tudor Government(London, 1970 ), 51 – 75.

  3. A view that has survived several vicissitudes: see David Grummitt,“Henry VII,
    Chamber Finance and the‘New Monarchy’: Some New Evidence,”Historical
    Research 72 ( 1999 ), 229 – 43 ( 241 ).
    22 .M.M.Condon,“Ruling Elites in the Reign of Henry VII,”Patronage, Pedigree and
    Power, ed. Charles Ross (Phoenix Mill, 1979 ), 109 – 42 ( 127 ). Arthurson notes the
    intelligencing value of the royal Issue Books (“Espionage and Intelligence,” 143 ).

  4. David Starkey,“The King’s Privy Chamber”( 1973 ), 357 – 65.

  5. Grummitt,“Household, Politics and Political Morality”which appeared too
    late for me to take full advantage of it, outlines a reading of Henry VII’s court
    style close to the one I offer here, drawing on Paul Strohm,Politique: Languages
    of Statecraft between Chaucer and Shakespeare(Notre Dame, 2005 ). Grummitt
    tellingly notes that“the physical space of the court acted as a place where the
    king could keep watch on his subjects”( 401 ). See, too, Hasler,“Allegories of
    Authority”, 39 – 45. My own reading of Skelton’s poem has been much assisted
    by Marc Shell’s comments on power, secrecy and money: seeThe Economy of
    Literature(Baltimore, 1978 ), 13 – 48.

  6. A copy ofL’Abuzéwas owned by Thomas Kebell,“kynges seriaunt at Lawe,”
    who died in 1500 : see Eric W. Ives,The Common Lawyers of Pre-Reformation
    England: Thomas Kebell, A Case Study(Cambridge, 1983 ), 367.

  7. Stephen Dickey,“Seven come Eleven: Gambling for the Laurel inThe Bowge
    of Courte,”Yearbook of English Studies 22 ( 1992 ), 238 – 54 ( 253 ).

  8. Pearsall,John Lydgate, 58 – 59.

  9. Alongside these lines, Ebin cites the Prologue toIsopes Fabulesas the only place
    in his output at which Lydgate“explicitly articulates the theory of poetry as a
    veil”(“Lydgate’sViews,” 96 note 37 ). This is not strictly accurate; Lydgate’s
    reference here is to poeticfictions as“blak erþe”( 22 ) concealing jewels, and
    “muscle shellys blake”( 27 ) within which pearls lie:The Minor Poems,ii.Lydgate
    also refers to“a manere / lyknesse and ffigure, / Dirk Outward / mysty for to
    see...As it were seyd / in Enigmate”in theSecrees of Olde Filisoffres( 729 – 30 ,
    732 ). It remains true that the trope is rare in his work when compared to the lexis
    of illumination and aureation; see, too, Meyer-Lee,Poets and Power, 183.
    29 .The Curial made by Maystere Alain Charretier, ed. F. J. Furnivall, EETS ES 54
    (London, 1888 ). All references are to this edition.

  10. For a similar suggestion, see Spearing,Medieval to Renaissance, 265.

  11. Augustine,De doctrina Christiana CCSLxxxii, ed. I. Martin (Turnhout, 1962 ),
    iii, vii, ix.
    32 .L’Abuzé en court, ed. Roger Dubuis (Paris, 1973 ), 103 , lines 41 – 42.

  12. Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius,Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis, ed.
    Iacobus Willis (Leipzig, 1970 ), 1. 2. 19 – 20. The translation is taken from
    W. H. Stahl (ed., intro. and trans.), commentary on theDream of Scipio
    (New York, 1952 ), 87.


Notes to Pages 46 – 50 191
Free download pdf