NOTES TO PAGES 331–37- Maurice Cranston, ‘‘John Locke and the Case for Toleration,’’ reprinted inJohn Locke: A
Letter Concerning Toleration in Focus, ed. Susan Mendus and John Horton (London: Routledge,
1991), 82–83. The majority of the contributors to this collection of essays follow Cranston in em-
phasizing the importance of Locke’s theory of private property for the argument against the ratio-
nality of religious persecution. - John Locke, ‘‘A Letter Concerning Toleration,’’ inTwo Treatises of GovernmentandA
Letter Concerning Toleration, 218. - Ibid., 217. See also: Kim Ian Parker,The Biblical Politics of John Locke(Waterloo, Ontario:
Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2004), 38–68; and Jeremy Waldron,God, Locke, and Equality:
Christian Foundations of John Locke’s Political Thought(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2002), 208–14. - Jeremy Waldron, ‘‘Locke: Toleration and the Rationality of Persecution,’’ inJustifying Tol-
eration, ed. Mendus, 63. See also: John Dunn, ‘‘What Is Living and What Is Dead in the Political
Theory of John Locke,’’ in hisInterpreting Political Responsibility: Essays 1981–1989(Cambridge:
Polity, 1990), 19; and Alex Tuckness, ‘‘Rethinking the Intolerant Locke,’’American Journal of Politi-
cal Science46, no. 2 (April 2002): 288–98. - John Locke,Two Tracts on Government(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967).
See also Kirstie M. McClure, ‘‘Difference, Diversity, and the Limits of Toleration,’’Political Theory
18, no. 3 (August 1990): 361–91, esp. 375–81. - Locke,A Letter Concerning Toleration, 229.
- John Locke,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding(Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1975), bk. 2I, chap. 21, §50 (p. 266); emphasis in original. - Charles Taylor,Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity(Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 1989), 161. - Franc ̧ois-Marie Arouet de Voltaire,Dictionnaire philosophique, reprinted inLes Œuvres
Comple`tes de Voltaire(Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1994), 36:552, my trans. - The following is based upon Voltaire,Traite ́sur la tole ́rance, reprinted inLes Œuvres Com-
pletes de Voltaire(Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2000), 56C:131–33. Voltaire’s account of the events
is not always historically accurate, but it indicates how he theorizes the circumstances under which
the issues of tolerance and toleration arise. - Ibid., 155, my trans.
- Ernest Cassirer,The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, trans. Fritz C. A. Koelln and James
P. Pettegrove (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951), 168. - Preston King,Toleration, new ed. (London: Frank Cass, 1998), 99–100.
- Rainer Forst,Toleranz im Konflikt: Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen
Begriffs(Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003), 389; emphasis in original, my trans. - Onora O’Neill,Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy(Cam-
bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 28. See also: Ju ̈rgen Habermas, ‘‘The Unity of Reason
in the Diversity of Its Voices,’’ trans. William Mark Hohengarten, reprinted inWhat Is Enlighten-
ment?ed. Schmidt, 399–425; Christine Korsgaard,Creating the Kingdom of Ends(Cambridge: Cam-
bridge University Press, 1996), 188–221; and Hans Saner,Kant’s Political Thought: Its Origins and
Development, trans. H. B. Ashton (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), 302–4. - Immanuel Kant,Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (Houndmills, Bas-
ingstoke: Macmillan, 1929), A708 / B736 - Michel Foucault, ‘‘Qu’est-ce que la critique? [Critique etAufkla ̈rung],’’Bulletin de la So-
cie ́te ́franc ̧aise de Philosophie84, no 2 (April-June 1990): 36. - Immanuel Kant, ‘‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’ ’’ trans. H. B.
Nisbet, inKant: Political Writings, 2d ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 54.
PAGE 735735.................16224$ NOTE 10-13-06 12:34:16 PS