untitled

NOTES TO PAGES 328–30

Political Liberalism(New York: Columbia University Press, 1993); Joseph Raz, ‘‘Autonomy, Tolera-
tion and the Harm Principle,’’ inJustifying Toleration, ed. Susan Mendus (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1988): and T. M. Scanlon, ‘‘The Difficulty of Tolerance,’’ inToleration: An Elusive
Virtue, ed. David Heyd (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).

2. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Ox-
   ford University Press, 1977), 159, §262. Other sources of inspiration include: William E. Connolly,
   The Ethos of Pluralization(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995), 16–19; Gilles De-
   leuze,Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994),
   129–68; Hubert L. Dreyfus,Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time,’
   division I(Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 108–27; and Charles Taylor,Modern Social Imaginaries
   (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2004), 23–30.


3. Apart from theOxford English Dictionary, I base this distinction betweentoleranceand
   tolerationon: Preston King,The Value of Tolerance(London: Frank Cass, 2001); Andrew R. Murphy,
   ‘‘Tolerance, Toleration, and the Liberal Tradition,’’Polity29, no. 4 (1997): 593–623; and G. Schlu ̈ter
   and R. Gro ̈tker, ‘‘Toleranz,’’ inHistorisches Wo ̈rterbuch der Philosophie, ed. Joachim Ritter and
   Karlfried Gru ̈nder (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1998).


4. Ole Peter Grell and Roy Porter, ‘‘Toleration in Enlightenment Europe,’’ in their edited
   volumeToleration in Enlightenment Europe(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 19. A
   partial list of historians and theorists who have explored the connection between the Enlightenment
   and the questions of tolerance and toleration includes: Martin Fitzpatrick, ‘‘Toleration and the
   Enlightenment Movement,’’ inToleration in Enlightenment Europe, ed. Grell and Porter; John Gray,
   Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age(London: Routledge,
   1995), 18–30; James Schmidt, ‘‘Introduction: What Is Enlightenment? a Question, Its Context, and
   Some Consequences,’’ in his edited volumeWhat Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and
   Twentieth-Century Questions(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 1–45; and Richard
   Tuck, ‘‘Scepticism and Toleration in the Seventeenth Century,’’ inJustifying Toleration, ed. Mendus.


5. See: Ian Hunter,Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern
   Germany(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001); Jonathan Israel,Radical Enlightenment:
   Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001); J. G. A.
   Pocock, ‘‘Enlightenment and the Revolution: The Case of North America,’’ inSeventh International
   Congress on the Enlightenment: Introductory Papers(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987); and
   Quentin Skinner,Vision of Politics, vol. 1:Regarding Method(Cambridge: Cambridge University
   Press, 2002).


6. Hunter,Rival Enlightenments, 21–22.


7. James Tully,An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts(Cambridge: Cambridge
   University Press, 1993), 48. Other theorists and historians who attribute the same importance to
   Locke as Tully (but may disagree why this is so) include: John Dunn, ‘‘The Claim to Freedom of
   Conscience: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought, Freedom of Worship?’’ inFrom Persecution
   to Toleration: The Glorious Revolution and Religion in England, ed. Ole Peter Grell et al. (Oxford:
   Oxford University Press, 1991); John Marshall,John Locke: Resistance, Religion, and Responsibility
   (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 33–72; Ian Shapiro, ‘‘John Locke’s Democratic
   Theory,’’ in John Locke,Two Treatises of GovernmentandA Letter Concerning Toleration(New
   Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), 318–22; and Alex Tuckness,Locke and the Legislative Point of
   View: Toleration, Contested Principles, and the Law(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002),
   17–25.


8. Henry Kamen,The Rise of Toleration(Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1967), 231; and Joseph Lecler,
   Toleration and the Reformation, trans. T. L. Westow (New York: Association Press, 1960), 2:473.

PAGE 734

734

.................16224$ NOTE 10-13-06 12:34:15 PS