FINAL WARNING: The Illuminati Influence on International Affairs
By February, 1950, after the public expressed their outrage over the
Resolution, the Liberals who sponsored it turned their backs on it in an
attempt to salvage their political reputations. Rep. Bernard W. Kearney
(R-New York) said: “We signed the Resolution believing we were
sponsoring a movement to set up a stronger power within the United
Nations for world peace ... Then we learned that various organizations
were working on state legislatures and on peace movements for world
government action under which the entire U.S. Government would be
submerged in a super world government ... Perhaps we should have
read the fine print in the first place. We do not intend to continue in the
role of sponsors of any movement which undermine U.S. sovereignty.
Many Congressmen feel as I do. We will make our position thoroughly
clear.” Within two years, 18 of the 23 states which had passed the
Resolution eventually rescinded it.Information about HCR64 / SCR56 can be found in the infamous
Document No. 87, Review of the United Nations Charter: A Collection
of Documents, by the Senate Subcommittee on the United Nations
Charter, and published by the Government Printing Office in 1954. It
was reportedly given to each of the Senators at the time, and only two
copies now remain in existence. This report blows the lid off of the U.
S. Government’s determination for one-world government. Also
discussed are Senate Resolution 133, introduced July 8, 1949 by Sen.
Sparkman (Democrat from Alabama) who said: “We can create now,
with Russia if possible, without Russia if necessary an overwhelming
collective front open to all nations under a law just to all.” The report
urged (p. 846): “American atomic, military, and economic superiority is
only temporary. It is essential before that superiority is lost that there
be created an international organization with strength to enforce the
peace.” Senate Concurrent Resolution 57, introduced July 26, 1949 by
Sen. Kefauver (D-Tennessee) called for an Atlantic Union of Canada,
England, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the
United States. The report said (p. 848): “The establishment of a federal
union ... would involve not only basic economic and social changes
but also important changes in the structure of the United States
Government. It is very doubtful if the American people are ready to
amend the Constitution to the extent necessary to give an Atlantic
Union the powers it would need to be effective.”Senate Concurrent Resolution 66, introduced September 13, 1949 by