American Politics Today - Essentials (3rd Ed)

(vip2019) #1
ENDNOTES A41


  1. For a discussion of Johnson’s decision, see Robert A. Caro, The
    Path to Power (New York: Knopf, 1983).

  2. Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein, The Permanent Cam-
    paign and Its Future (Washington, DC: American Enterprise
    Institute, 2000).

  3. David Mayhew, Congress: The Electoral Connection (New
    Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973).

  4. Jonathan Krasno and Donald P. Green, “The Dynamics of
    Campaign Fundraising in House Elections,” Journal of Poli-
    tics 56 (1991): 459–74.

  5. Michael J. Goff , The Money Primary: The New Politics of the
    Early Presidential Nomination Process (New York: Rowman &
    Littlefi eld, 2007).

  6. Chris Cillizza, “Consulting Firms Face Confl ict in 2008,” Roll
    Call, June 20, 2005. p. 1.

  7. Matt Bai, “Turnout Wins Elections,” New York Times Maga-
    zine, December 14, 2003, p. 100.

  8. Christopher Drew, “New Telemarketing Ploy Steers Voters on
    Republican Path,” New York Times, November 6, 2006.

  9. Michael Shear and Richard A. Oppel, “For Perry, a Cringe-
    Worthy Gaff e,” New York Times, http://thecaucus.blogs
    .nytimes.com/2011/11/09/for-perry-a-cringe-worthy-gaff e/,
    November 9, 2011 (accessed 10/19/12).

  10. For a history of presidential debates, see the Commission on
    Presidential Debates site, http://www.debates.org (accessed 10/19/12).

  11. Molly Ball, “This Year’s Attack Ads Cut Deeper,” Politico, Octo-
    ber 17, 2010, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43698
    .html (accessed 10/19/12).

  12. For a video library of presidential campaign ads, see Museum
    of the Moving Image, “The Living Room Candidate: Presiden-
    tial Campaign Commercials 1952–2012,” http://livingroom-
    candidate.org (accessed 10/19/12).

  13. For examples of this argument, see Thomas Patterson, The
    Vanishing Voter (New York: Knopf, 2002); Jules Witcover,
    No Way to Pick a President: How Money and Hired Guns Have
    Debased American Politics (London: Routledge, 2001).

  14. For examples of these and other campaign ads, see “Most
    Intriguing Campaign Ads of 2010,” ABC News, http://
    abcnews.go.com/politics/slideshow/intriguing-political
    -ads-2010-10887147 (accessed 10/19/12).

  15. Steven Ansolabehere and Shanto Iyengar, Going Negative:
    How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Elector-
    ate (New York: Free Press, 1997); Richard Lau, Lee Sigelman,
    Caroline Heldman, and Paul Babbitt, “The Eff ects of Negative
    Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Analysis,” Ameri-
    can Political Science Review 93 (1999): 851–70.

  16. Paul Freeman, Michael Franz, and Kenneth Goldstein, “Cam-
    paign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship,” American
    Journal of Political Science 48 (2004): 723–41.

  17. Constantine J. Spilotes and Lynn Vavreck, “Campaign Adver-
    tising: Partisan Convergence or Divergence,” Journal of Poli-
    tics 64 (2002): 249–61.

  18. Kathleen Hall Jameson, Packaging the Presidency: A History
    and Criticism of Presidential Campaign Advertising (New
    York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

  19. Data compiled from Center for Responsive Politics, “Politi-
    cal Parties Overview: Election Cycle 2012,” http://www.opensecrets
    .org/parties/index.php (accessed 11/2/12).

  20. Patricia Zapor, “Pro-life Democrats Describe Lonely Role,
    but See Improvements,” Catholic News Service, July 28, 2004,
    http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0404122.htm
    (accessed 3/27/08).

  21. See http://www.lp.org/our-history (accessed 6/5/12).

  22. Pew Research & American Life Project surveys 2000-2009,”
    available at http://www.pewinternet.org/static-pages/trend-data/
    online-activities-20002009.aspx (accessed 12/1/09).

  23. See http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php (accessed
    6/5/12).


You Decide


a. Nelson Polsby, Consequences of Party Reform (New York:
Oxford University Press, 1983).
b. Daniel A. Smith and Caroline J. Tolbert, Educated by Initia-
tive: The Eff ects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political
Organizations in the American States (Ann Arbor: University
of Michigan Press, 2004).


CHAPTER 7


  1. Morris P. Fiorina, Retrospective Voting in American National
    Elections (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981); V. O.
    Key, The Responsible Electorate (New York: Vintage, 1966).

  2. David Mayhew, Congress: The Electoral Connection (New
    Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973).

  3. For details on early voting, see the Early Voting Information
    Center site, http://earlyvoting.net/ (accessed 10/19/12).

  4. See http://www.cnn.com/ELECTIONS (accessed 10/19/12).

  5. For details, see the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project
    site, http://www.vote.caltech.edu (accessed 10/19/12).

  6. Randall Stross, “The Big Gamble on Electronic Voting,” New
    York Times, September 24, 2006. p. 3.

  7. Minor party candidates are typically selected during party
    conventions.

  8. Barbara Norrander, “Presidential Nomination Politics in the
    Post-Reform Era,” Political Research Quarterly 49 (1996):
    875–90.

  9. Larry Bartels, Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of
    Public Choice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
    1988).

  10. For a discussion of the 2004 conventions, see Kennedy School
    of Government, Campaigning for President: The Managers
    Look at 2004 (New York: Rowman & Littlefi eld, 2005).

  11. FairVote, “Maine and Nebraska,” http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/
    me_ne.htm (accessed 10/19/12).

  12. James Q. Wilson, “Is the Electoral College Worth Saving?”
    Slate, November 3, 2000, http://www.slate.com/id/92663 (accessed
    10/19/12).

  13. Steven Ansolabehere and Allan Gerber, “Incumbency Advan-
    tage and the Persistence of Legislative Majorities,” Legislative
    Studies Quarterly 22 (1997): 161–80.

Free download pdf