of the genocide--the worst genocide of the present century to date. This genocide, which was
aimed especially against all merely literate Cambodians as well as professional strata, had the
purpose of sending all of Southeast Asia back into a "dark age." That "dark age" policy is the
policy of the present Peking regime. That is the regime which Kissinger, Bush and Brzezinski
admire so much as an "ally." [...]The leading circles of London have no difficulty in recognizing what "Peking Communism" is. It
is their philosophy, their policy in a Chinese mandarin culture form. To the extent that Yalies of
the Skull and Bones sort are brought into the same culture as their superiors in London, such
Yalies, like Bush, also have deep affection for "Peking Communism."Like Bush, who supports neo-Malthusian doctrines and zero-growth and anti-nuclear policies, the
Peking rulers are dedicated to a "one world" order in which the population is halved over the next
twenty years (i.e. genocide far greater than Hitler's), and most of the survivors are driven into
barbarism and cultism under the rule of parasitical blue blood families of the sort represented in
the membership of the Skull and Bones.^In that sense, Bush is to be viewed without quibble as a "Manchurian candidate." From the
vantage point of the US Constitution and American System of technological progress and capital
formation, Bush is in effect an agent of the same evil philosophies and policies as the rulers of
Peking.^That, dear friends, is not mere opinion; that is hard fact. [fn 18]This leaflet represented the most accurate and devastating personal and political
indictment Bush had ever received in his career. It was clear that LaRouche had Bush's
number. The linking of Bush with the Cambodian genocide is all the more surprising
since most of the evidence on Bush's role was at that time not in the public domain. Other
aspects of LaRouche's comments are prophetic: Bush's "deep affection" for Chinese
communism was to become an international scandal when Bush maintained his solidarity
with Deng Xiao-ping after the Tien An Men massacre of 1989. Oustanding is LaRouche's
reference to the "One World Order" which the world began to wonder about as the "New
World Order" in the late summer of 1990, during the buildup for Bush's Gulf war;
LaRouche had identified the policy content of the term way back in 1980.
Bush' handlers were stunned, then enraged. No one had ever dared to stand up to George
Bush and Skull and Bones like this before. The Bush entourage wanted revenge. A vote
fraud to deprive LaRouche of virtually all the votes cast in the Democratic primary, and
transfer as many of them as possible to the Bush column, would be the first installment.
Bush is vindictive, and he would not forget this attack by LaRouche. Later Bush would
despatch Howard and Tucker, two agents provocateurs from Midland, Texas to try to
infiltrate pro-LaRouche's political circles. From 1986 on, Bush would emerge as a
principal sponsor of a judicial vendetta by the Department of Justice that would see
LaRouche and several of his supporters twice indicted, and finally convicted on a series
of trumped-up charges. One week after George Bush's inauguration as president, his most
capable and determined opponent, Lyndon LaRouche, would be thrown into federal
prison.
But in the New Hampshire of 1979-80, LaRouche's attacks on Bush brought into precise
focus many aspects of Bush's personality that voters found profoundly distasteful.