The questions must be asked could those thorns that were place upon Jesus
be held in the same regard as the cross does as his blood touch both of them.The answer is of course an unequivocal no.And can anyone with sound intellect understand or appreciate any of these illogical
explanations for their religious malpractice. Of course NO!
Thirdly :
One finds in the book that the Christians hold in their hands today the names of
many prophets of God who the Christians claim where Gods and son’s of God in their
own right.
This is why if one was to ask a Christian how many sons does your God have? They
will surely reply just the one.
An answer that is puzzling how can this be accepted when the Christians have in
their scripture the names of many of Gods sons.
This is utterly objectionable and contradictory and makes no sense to anyone of a
sound mind.
Fourthly :
The contradiction in respect of the creation of Jesus (pbuh)
The Christians claim that Jesus is the begotten son of God and not the created son.
The question is how is one begotten and not created?
The fact that Jesus was born ultimately means that he was in need of some one to
bring him into existence, it also means that before his birth he was not in existence
and was nothing and so owned nothing.
What is clear is that Jesus was a creation from among the creation of Allah and He
Allah bought him into existence in a miraculous way as he bought Adam (pbuh) into
existence without a father and a mother.
They not being satisfied with claiming divinity for Jesus they went one step further
and claimed that he was the begotten son of God.
The NIV translation of John 3:16 is different from the King James Version. The
translators have removed the word "begotten" and say "one and only" Son. All other
translations use "begotten" and the Nicene Creed clearly translates the word
"begotten."
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son , that whosoever
believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (John 3:16—KJV)