Computational Chemistry

(Steven Felgate) #1

  1. (a) Leach AR (2001) Molecular modelling, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Essex, England, chapter
    12; (b) H€oltje H-D, Folkers G (1996) Molecular modelling, applications in medicinal
    chemistry. VCH, Weinheim, Germany; (c) van de Waterbeemd H, Testa B, Folkers G
    (eds) (1997) Computer-assisted lead finding and optimization. VCH, Weinheim, Germany

  2. Dewar MJS, Storch DM (1985) J Am Chem Soc 107:3898

  3. For a series of small, mostly nonbiological molecules AM1 seemed better than PM3, except
    for O-H/O hydrogen bonds: Dannenberg JJ (1997) J Mol Struct (Theochem) 410:279

  4. In model systems of biological relevance, mostly involving water, PM3 was superior to
    AM1: Zheng Y-J, Merz KM (1992) J Comp Chem 13:1151


Easier Questions.............................................................



  1. Outline the similarities and differences between the extended H€uckel method
    on the one hand and methods like AM1 and PM3 on the other. What advantages
    does the EHM have over more accurate semiempirical methods?

  2. Outline the similarities and differences between molecular mechanics, ab
    initio, and semiempirical methods.

  3. Both the simple H€uckel and the PPP methods arepelectron methods, but PPP
    is more complex. Itemize the added features of PPP.

  4. What is the main advantage of an all-valence-electron method like, say, CNDO
    over a purelypelectron method like PPP?

  5. Explain the terms ZDO, CNDO, INDO, and NDDO, showing why the latter
    three represent a progressive conceptual improvement.

  6. How does an AM1 or PM3 “total electron wavefunction”Cdiffer from theC
    of an ab initio calculation?

  7. Ab initio energies are “total dissociation” energies (dissociation to electrons
    and atomic nuclei) and AM1 and PM3 energies are standard heats of formation.
    Is one of these kinds of energy more useful? Why or why not?

  8. For certain kinds of molecules molecular mechanics can give better geometries
    and relative energies than can even sophisticated semiempirical methods. What
    kinds of properties can the latter calculate that MM cannot?

  9. Why do transition metal compounds present special difficulties for AM1 and
    PM3?

  10. Although both AM1 and PM3 normally give good molecular geometries, they
    are not too successful in dealing with geometries involving hydrogen bonds
    (PM3 seems to be the better one here). Suggest reasons for this deficiency.


Harder Questions.............................................................



  1. Why are even very carefully-parameterized semiempirical methods like AM1
    and PM3 not as accurate and reliable as high-level (e.g. MP2, CI, coupled-
    cluster) ab initio calculations?


Harder Questions 443

Free download pdf