128 THE
ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
reduction, in effect,the ethical criticismof archi-tectureattemptedto achieve.Norwas thereany-
thingabsurdintheattempt.The ethical
criticism, then, though it claims adifferentsanctionandraisesawiderissue,arosefromtheromantic. It arose, also, las a protest against,themechanical
theory. Its
motivewastoassertthehuman reference of art against the empty cult of
abstracttechnique. Wehavealreadyseenthatthe
extreme constructionalideal ofarchitecturewas
nomorethanaphaseofnineteenthcenturymaterialism.It ignored feeling. It neglected alike the aestheticconscienceandthe moral.
Itappealedsolelytoanintellectwhichrecognisednolawbutthemechanical.Itwasanepisodeinthedehumanisation
ofthought:a process which, carried to its logical conclusion,rendersallvaluesunmeaning. Such
aprocess,how-everpowerfulitsimpulse, could
notbutprovokeinmanymindsanimmediateresistance. But
itwasaresistance in the field of
ethics and theology. Forhere were the interests
which materialism seemedmostobviouslyandimmediately
tochallenge: here,atany rate, werethe interests
which itwas all-im-portant
tosafeguard.
^Estheticvaluesare
aluxury
;theyare readilyforgotten
whenmore vitalconflictsbecome acute. Thus,
the necessary
counter-attacktothemovement
ofsciencewas
consequentlyethicalin temper. Its concern
was with conduct
and not