THE
ETHICAL FALLACY
129primarily with art.
It was, in effect,
a Puritan
revival. The intellectual
alternative was strict:eitheratruculentmaterialism
(withconsequencesfor
architecturealreadyanalysed)oramoralistic
ardourmoreseverethananythat
hadbeendominantsincetheseventeenth
century.Hereweretwosinisterantagonists. The
amiableprovincesofart,
whichlayforgottenandunguardedattheirside,soontrembledwiththeconflict. Archi-tecturebecame
arallying
point; forwhilethecon-structivebasis
ofthe
artexposeditobviouslytothescientific attack, its ecclesiastical tradition
invitedfor it, noless, a religious defence.
In this region,wheretheairwasdensewithancientsentiment, themorallossessufferedinthe territoryof
metaphysicsmight,evenbyashakenarmy,bemadegood. Itwas
a Puritan revival,butwith thisdifference: the fer-vourofPuritanismwasnowactiveinvindicating
thevalueofart. Itinsistedthatarchitecture
wassome-thing more than amechanical
problem. It gaveita human reference. But, unluckily,this
Puritanattack,farfromclearingthepathofcriticism,
didbutencumberitwith freshidols,equallyvainiflessin-human
than the categories of science.
Art wasremembered,butthestandardsofart
remainedfor-gotten.The old Puritanism of the
seventeenthcenturyhadweighedtheinfluenceonlife
ofartasawhole.Ithadcondemneditand
drivenitforthfromI