THE ETHICAL
FALLACY
151Ihough
it is nobler in restraint,
fBut thestrengthof thebaroqueis adeceit. It 'proteststoo much,'andfor
the usualreason: thatitsboastisinsecure.Itsmassisalltooprobablylesshuge,itsvistaslessprolonged,itsrichnessless
precious,thanitpretends.Thechargeoffalseconstruction,asconstruction,has,itis true, been dealt
with; the argumentfromscience fell, as wesaw,to nothing. Butthisis an
argument ofmoral taste. Can weapprove a style
thussaturatedwithdeceit
: astyleoffalse
facades,false perspectives, false masonry and false gold?Forallthese, it must be agreed, are found in thebaroqueas
theyarefoundinno
otherstyleofarchi-tecture. Itisanart,notindeedalways,butfartoo_often,
of'deceit.'Thisisprobablythecommonest
ofalltheprejudicesagainsttheRenaissancestyleinitsfulldevelopment.Buthere, too, thefactsare sounder thanthe con-clusions.Theharmfulnessofdeceitlies,itmustbesupposed,eitherasaqualityinthe willofthedeceiver, orinthedamageinflictedbythedeceit.
If,indischargeofadebt,amanweretogivemeinsteadofasove-
reignagildedfarthing,hewouldfail,nodoubt,ofhispromise,whichwas togiveme thevalueoftwenty
shillings. To
deceivemewasesisentialtohisplanand
thedesire todosoimpliedinhisattempt. Butif,whenIhavelenthimnothing,heweretogiveme
a