Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_C Date:31/3/09
Time:21:45:53 Filepath://ppdys1108/BlackwellCup/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-
9781405132879/appln/3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_C.3d
ends, and paid considerable attention to the
interests of the political ruler and the military
commander. Although Strabo was born in
Greece, he enjoyed the patronage of
Augustus and did most of his work in Rome,
so that hisGeography can be read as an
attempt to explain the post-Republican world
(theinhabitedworld,orecumene)tothecitizens
of the new Roman Empire (Dueck, 2000).
Chorography was not supposed to provide a
comprehensive gazeteer or regional inventory:
it was partial and purposive, and Strabo focused
on Rome and began witheuropebecause ‘it is
admirably adapted by nature for the develop-
ment of excellence in men and governments’
(van Paassen, 1957, pp. 1–32).
Strabo’s conception of geography was chal-
lenged by Claudius Ptolemaeus (or Ptolemy)
round aboutad150. In his view, the purpose
of geography was to provide ‘a view of the
whole head’ and this meant that he separated
geography from chorography, which had the
purpose ‘of describing the parts, as if one were
to draw only an ear or an eye’. As this passage
implies, for Ptolemy,grapheindid not mean
describing but drawing and, specifically, map-
ping. Ptolemy’s ‘geography’ was geodesy and
cartography, and he preferred to leave out
everything that had no direct connection with
that aim: ‘We shall expand our ‘‘guide’’ for so
far as this is useful for the knowledge of the
location of places and their setting upon the
map, but we shall leave out of consideration all
the many details about the peculiarities of the
peoples’ (van Paassen, 1957, p. 2).
The distance between Strabo and Ptolemy
could not be plainer, and it is indelibly present
in the modern constitution ofgeographytoo.
As late as the seventeenth century, Strabo
and Ptolemy continued to provide the main
models for European geography. The usual
distinction was between aSpecial Geography,
devoted to a description of particular regions,
and a General Geography, mathematically
oriented and concerned with the globe as a
whole. The premier illustration is the work
of Bernhard Varenius, who published both
studies in Special Geography and his famous
Geographia generalis, in which, for the first time,
geography sought to engage with the ideas of
Bacon, Descartes and Galileo (Bowen, 1981).
The modern case for geography as chorology
was argued most forcefully by Hartshorne
(1939), and following the subsequent debate
over exceptionalism in geography – and
despite the nuances and qualifications that
Hartshorne had registered – chorology was
often used in polemical opposition tospatial
science(cf. Sack, 1974a). But the temper of
the original version, with its acknowledgement
of the importance ofpowerand philosophical
reflection (cf. Casey, 2001, p. 683), is a force-
ful reminder of the continuing need to attend
to the politics of geographical enquiry, while
Koelsch (2004) has insisted that contempor-
ary attempts to understand the heterogeneous
geography of the world still have much to learn
from ‘the place-based, cultural–historical
model’ of Strabo. dg
Suggested reading
Koelsch (2004).
choropleth A map that portrays a single
distribution forcensus tracts, counties or
similar areal units; portrays each areal unit as
homogeneous; divides the data into discrete
categories; and typically describes spatial
variation of intensity data with a darker-
means-more sequence of greytones. Readily
rendered by mapping software, choropleth
maps can present misleading patterns when
based on count data, highly heterogeneous
areal units, inappropriateclass intervalsor
illogical sequences of colours (Brewer and
Pickle, 2002; Monmonier, 2005). Although
most choropleth maps depict quantitative
distributions such as median income or the
percentage rate of population growth, qualita-
tive choropleth maps are useful for showing
distributions such as dominant religion or
form of government. mm
Suggested reading
Monmonier (1993).
chronotope Translated as ‘time–space’ from
its origins in Greek, the term is used to desig-
nate the spatio-temporal contexts and categor-
ies embedded within a text or other cultural
artefact. The term was devised by Russian
literary theorist and philosopher Mikhail
Bakhtin (1895–1975) in the 1920s, partly
influenced by the revolutionary transform-
ation of physics by Einstein, Planck and
others, and it was subsequently imported into
literary history and cultural studies. In the
most general terms, the idea of a chronotope
acknowledges the inseparability oftimeand
spacewhile deploying their unity to material-
ize concrete cultural formations. It is perhaps
best to think of a chronotope as a kind
of matrix that allows cultural analysts to situ-
ate a work within its historico-geographical
setting in order to facilitate its interpretation.
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_C Final Proof page 83 31.3.2009 9:45pm
CHRONOTOPE